53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting 2015
DOI: 10.2514/6.2015-0574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dissipative Filter for the Discontinuous Galerkin method

Abstract: Complex three dimensional flows in domains with nontrivial geometry require use of mixed type unstructured meshes. The discontinuous Galerkin (DG) method is an unstructured grid method and development of a unified approach for discontinuity capturing with the DG method when higher order expansions are employed is therefore required. A systematic procedure for incorporating a dissipative mechanism to DG discretizations in unstructured meshes is developed. This adaptive non-linear dissipative mechanism enables c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Grid‐based (as opposed to meshless) numerical solution of the governing equations of fluid flow can be achieved on structured or unstructured grids. Although the recent trend in LES has been for the application of finite volume and finite element methods on unstructured grids, the present study focuses on the use of structured grids for two principal reasons: firstly, the accuracy of the computation on unstructured grids often suffers when extreme gradients are experienced along the dominant flow direction, as is the case in boundary layer flow, for example , and secondly, unstructured grids are often not suitable for use with multigrid methods, which have been used by the authors in the past to achieve very efficient computations. In addition, the immersed boundary method (IBM) permits the accurate and efficient representation of complex solid bodies on fixed Cartesian grids, thereby circumventing one of the main perceived limitations of structured grids, which is their inability to represent complex geometries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grid‐based (as opposed to meshless) numerical solution of the governing equations of fluid flow can be achieved on structured or unstructured grids. Although the recent trend in LES has been for the application of finite volume and finite element methods on unstructured grids, the present study focuses on the use of structured grids for two principal reasons: firstly, the accuracy of the computation on unstructured grids often suffers when extreme gradients are experienced along the dominant flow direction, as is the case in boundary layer flow, for example , and secondly, unstructured grids are often not suitable for use with multigrid methods, which have been used by the authors in the past to achieve very efficient computations. In addition, the immersed boundary method (IBM) permits the accurate and efficient representation of complex solid bodies on fixed Cartesian grids, thereby circumventing one of the main perceived limitations of structured grids, which is their inability to represent complex geometries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%