2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11119-013-9314-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A discussion on the significance associated with Pearson’s correlation in precision agriculture studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This confirms, for non‐irrigated cool‐climate juice grape production, the findings of Tisseyre et al. () in non‐irrigated warm‐climate wine grape production systems. The first inference from this result is that it would appear redundant to be taking intensive, expensive annual measurements of vine size once the spatial pattern of vine size has been established in a vineyard.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This confirms, for non‐irrigated cool‐climate juice grape production, the findings of Tisseyre et al. () in non‐irrigated warm‐climate wine grape production systems. The first inference from this result is that it would appear redundant to be taking intensive, expensive annual measurements of vine size once the spatial pattern of vine size has been established in a vineyard.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This is due to the strong relationships observed for all correlations ( r > 0.5). The difference, however, between n (1147) and the n eff on the raw (∼850) and interpolated (∼28) datasets indicates that for analyses where the r ‐values are not as strong, the choice of sample size ( n or n eff ) may affect the P ‐value and the interpretation of significance (Taylor and Bates ). The autocorrelation within data (and assumption of independence) should always be considered when performing Pearson's correlation on spatial data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial autocorrelation may violate the assumption of independence in the correlation analysis, leading to a biased estimation of variances and correlation coefficient (Dutilleul et al, 1993). Although the Dutilleul correction is commonly applied in ecology, it is not widespread in agricultural studies, which often overestimate the significance of the Pearson's coefficient in spatial datasets (Taylor and Bates, 2013). The analysis at sub-field level was performed using PASSaGE v2 software (Pattern Analysis, Spatial Statistics and Geographic Exegesis; Tempe, AR, USA) to calculate the modified significance test as proposed by Dutilleul (Rosenberg and Anderson, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pearson’s correlation analysis was performed to assess the relationship among seed and oil yields, Co - rbcL and Co-rbcS expressions, and P N . The significance of the correlations was tested using the critical value table ( Taylor and Bates, 2013 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%