2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2014.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A discussion on incorporating the Poisson effect in microbeam models based on modified couple stress theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since incorporating the Poisson's ratio causes underestimation of de ection due to the overestimation of bending rigidity of microbeam [10,11], the Poisson's ratio is assumed here to be zero. For all considered examples, unless mentioned otherwise, the beam's dimensions are L = 20h 1 and b = 2h 1 .…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since incorporating the Poisson's ratio causes underestimation of de ection due to the overestimation of bending rigidity of microbeam [10,11], the Poisson's ratio is assumed here to be zero. For all considered examples, unless mentioned otherwise, the beam's dimensions are L = 20h 1 and b = 2h 1 .…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also investigated the Poisson's e ect on the static bending and free vibration of a simply supported beam. However, later, it was shown that considering Poisson's e ect can lead to erroneous results, and the results obtained by omitting Poisson's e ect are much closer to the experimental data [10,11]. Kahrobaiyan et al [12] used modi ed couple stress theory to obtain the dynamic characteristics of atomic force microscopes cantilevers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…47,48 The MCST o®ers a direct framework to deal with the inclusion of internal material length scale of one-dimensional (1D), two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) micron-scale structures, 32,49,50 and is the theory adopted in the current study. Useful discussions on some aspect of the MCST and other nonclassical models of micro-scale beams are presented in the recent studies by Dehrouyeh-Semnani et al 51,52 By complementing the theoretical basis of the MCST with an appropriate homogenization scheme, a number of representative studies have been reported in the literature on the frequency analyses of FG micro-scale beams. Thē rst known model of FG microbeams, premised on the MCST and the classical rule of mixture, is reported in Asghari et al 53 The authors presented solution for the model of the FG microbeam with pinned ends in the absence of the e®ect of the axial coupling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Askari and Tahani [23] investigated size-dependent dynamic pull-in analysis of beam-type MEMS under mechanical shock based on the modified couple stress theory. Dehrouyeh-Semnani and Nikkhah-Bahrami [24] presented a discussion on incorporating the Poisson effect in microbeam models based on the modified couple stress theory. Farokhi and Ghayesh [25] investigated nonlinear dynamical behaviour of geometrically imperfect microplates based on the modified couple stress theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%