2011
DOI: 10.1021/jp109151s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Discussion of the pH-Dependent Protonation Behaviors of Poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) (PDMAEMA) and Poly(ethylenimine-ran-2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) (P(EI-r-EOz))

Abstract: In this article, we present results of our experimental and atomistic simulation studies of the pH-dependent protonation behaviors of poly(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) (PDMAEMA) and poly(ethylenimine) (PEI). The potentiometric titration profiles of the PDMAEMA polymer and its unpolymerized monomer (i.e., DMAEMA) were measured under identical conditions in order to study the influence of the covalent linkage of the amine groups on their protonation behavior. The titration curves of poly(ethylenimine-ran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
129
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
8
129
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The wettability data presented in Table 1 shows that PDMAEMA is more hydrophobic than the other polymers, but the difference does not suggest that the materials is uncharged, in which case the hydrophobic nature of the hydrocarbons would be more pronounced. A more thorough investigation of the pHdependence shows that at high pH, of PDMAEMA is uncharged, and collapsed, but both our own unpublished investigations (Yandi et al In preparation) and published data (Lee et al 2011) demonstrate that this is not the case at the pH of ASW, but that PDMAEMA have approximately 10% of the amino residues protonated at a pH of 8.2. Hence, we here refer to PDMAEMA as 'cationic', although the polymer itself is nominally neutral.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The wettability data presented in Table 1 shows that PDMAEMA is more hydrophobic than the other polymers, but the difference does not suggest that the materials is uncharged, in which case the hydrophobic nature of the hydrocarbons would be more pronounced. A more thorough investigation of the pHdependence shows that at high pH, of PDMAEMA is uncharged, and collapsed, but both our own unpublished investigations (Yandi et al In preparation) and published data (Lee et al 2011) demonstrate that this is not the case at the pH of ASW, but that PDMAEMA have approximately 10% of the amino residues protonated at a pH of 8.2. Hence, we here refer to PDMAEMA as 'cationic', although the polymer itself is nominally neutral.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Increasing the temperature to 40 °C gave no improvement over the conversion or the control over the MWD (Đ ≥ 1.76), which demonstrates that this combination of initiator, solvent, ligand cannot facilitate the con trolled polymerization of MMA (Table 1, Entry 2 and Figure S2). MBPA, a much less explored initiator, [42][43][44] exhibits high activity and should thus be suitable for methacrylates given they are considered active monomers. 9 Significantly, switching the initiator from EBiB to MBPA gave rise to low dispersities (Ð~1.15) although the conversion did not exceed 79% (overnight) even when the temperature was increased to 40 °C (Table 1, Entries 3-4 and Figure S3-S4).…”
Section: Methyl Methacrylate Evaluating Optimization Towards Universmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] These properties render polyamines a good candidate for a wide range of applications such as gene delivery 4 , waste water treatment 5 , paper making 6 and cosmetics 7 . In comparison to the analogous methacrylate, poly(dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) (PDMAEMA), poly(dimethylaminoethyl acrylate) (PDMAEA) has attracted further interest due to its ability to provide a timed release mechanism facilitated by its selfcatalysed hydrolysis in water to polyacrylic acid and N,N'-dimethylaminoethanol.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%