1959
DOI: 10.2307/1930047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Discussion of the Importance of the Screen Size in Washing Quantitative Marine Bottom Samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
37
0
5

Year Published

1970
1970
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
37
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Once sediment samples were collected, there can also be inconsistencies in processing, usually in which mesh size is used to separate organisms from sediment. This is a well-known problem in benthic ecological studies (Reish, 1959), but there is no obvious way to correct for it. Here, the older data (1969À74) were based on mesh sizes of 1.0 mm or 1.5 mm, whereas the newer data are based on a 0.5-mm mesh.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once sediment samples were collected, there can also be inconsistencies in processing, usually in which mesh size is used to separate organisms from sediment. This is a well-known problem in benthic ecological studies (Reish, 1959), but there is no obvious way to correct for it. Here, the older data (1969À74) were based on mesh sizes of 1.0 mm or 1.5 mm, whereas the newer data are based on a 0.5-mm mesh.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is notable that so many species contributed to the opportunist peaks and that Capitella and Heteromastus were not predominant, as is generally the case (e.g., Dean & Haskin 1964;Swarlz et al 1985;Leppiikoski 1975). Capitellid numbers were probably underestimated by sieving through a 1.00 mm mesh (Reish 1959). Nevertheless, some of the common species contributing to these peaks (Gisborne species Group 3, and Hastings species Groups 1 and 2) belonged to genera often regarded as "transitionary": for example, Chaetozone, Goniada, Paraprionospio, Pectinaria, and Prionospio have been described as secondary colonists, characterised by their appearance after the initial colonists, such as Capitella, in the successional trajectory (Grassle & Grassle 1974;Pearson 1975;Pearson & Rosenberg 1976;Rosenberg 1976).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No así dos taxa pertenecientes a la familia Paraonidae, uno de ellos A. catherinae ha sido registrado para la zona de Magallanes (Montiel et al, 2002), mientras que el género Paradoneis no ha sido descrito para la costa de Chile, por lo que su identificación necesita una revisión que confirme su presencia. El uso de la malla de 1 mm reduce los costos de monitoreo (Ferraro et al, 1989) debido a que el tiempo involucrado en el análisis de muestras de sedimento y macrofauna bentónica aumenta cuanto más fina sea la abertura de malla del tamiz (Reish, 1959). Por lo tanto al usar la malla de 500 µm de abertura, aumenta considerablemente el tiempo necesario para el lavado, cernido e identificación taxonómica, en comparación con la malla de 1 mm (Kingston & Riddle, 1989;Couto et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…La malla de 1 mm se recomienda en la detección de impacto antropogénico en el sedimento, ya que la información adicional generada a través de la malla de 500 µm no mejora la posibilidad de detectar diferencias entre áreas potencialmente impactadas y las estaciones de referencia (Hartley, 1982;Bishop & Hartley, 1986;Ferraro et al, 1989Ferraro et al, , 1994Thompson et al, 2003). En particular, la literatura reporta que el uso de la malla de 500 µm permite incrementar las estimaciones de densidad, biomasa, y número de taxa (Reish, 1959;Bachelet, 1990;Couto et al, 2010). Los resultados de este estudio muestran que al usar la malla de 500 µm aumentó la abundancia de poliquetos oportunistas, P. orensanzi y representantes de la familia Capitellidae, asignadas según listado AMBI al GE IV y V como fue señalado por Couto et al (2010).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified