2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2014.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A discrete geometry approach for tolerance analysis of mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers have proposed numerical optimization approaches with several objective functions (convex hull volume, Euclidean distance, weighted unsigned distance, weighted signed distance) [23], experimental and theoretical investigations using the SDT and clearance domain (gap hull) models [24], the Fast Fourier Transform and the Conjugate Gradient Method in case of elastic contact of rough surfaces [25,26], development of an optimization algorithm and geometric interference relationships [27] and some other methods in [28][29][30]. Moreover, some others researchers proposed to study the floating contacts by means of a regularized closure function and a constrained optimization problem [31], Virtual Work Principle and a contact model of joints to determine the displacements at each node and relative displacements/rotations of the kinematic pairs [32], constrained registration techniques and difference surface in a sequential positioning problem [33], Tooth Contact Analysis algorithm [2,34], the Gap Hull estimation [35]. Among all the previous methods, the Signed Distance Approach [17,18,20,23] combined with an optimization technique is selected to characterize the fixed and sliding contacts assembly in the mechanical system.…”
Section: Mathematical Formulation Of the Assembly Feasibility Of The mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some researchers have proposed numerical optimization approaches with several objective functions (convex hull volume, Euclidean distance, weighted unsigned distance, weighted signed distance) [23], experimental and theoretical investigations using the SDT and clearance domain (gap hull) models [24], the Fast Fourier Transform and the Conjugate Gradient Method in case of elastic contact of rough surfaces [25,26], development of an optimization algorithm and geometric interference relationships [27] and some other methods in [28][29][30]. Moreover, some others researchers proposed to study the floating contacts by means of a regularized closure function and a constrained optimization problem [31], Virtual Work Principle and a contact model of joints to determine the displacements at each node and relative displacements/rotations of the kinematic pairs [32], constrained registration techniques and difference surface in a sequential positioning problem [33], Tooth Contact Analysis algorithm [2,34], the Gap Hull estimation [35]. Among all the previous methods, the Signed Distance Approach [17,18,20,23] combined with an optimization technique is selected to characterize the fixed and sliding contacts assembly in the mechanical system.…”
Section: Mathematical Formulation Of the Assembly Feasibility Of The mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that the total simulations time presented in these tables in case of tolerance analysis using the KDE simulation samples, includes the time of the preliminary MCS applied to obtain the original data, the time to get the joint PDF of the clearance components and the new samples and finally the time to carry out the whole tolerance analysis simulation. Thus, 1 T represents the addition of the time to carry out the preliminary MCS to get the original data and the time to generate new samples (matrix P) of gap components based on the KDE method; 2 T represents the time to carry out the tolerance analysis of the mechanical system using the KDE simulation samples. This particular example does not imply multiple fixed, sliding and floating contacts during simulations.…”
Section: Fig 4 Data Scatterplot Matrices: (A) Original Data (B) Kdementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The design tolerances estimated through this simulation subsequently determine the manufacturing tolerances. In another approach, complex workpiece with intricate shapes are classified based on its overall discrete geometry and tolerance analysis is performed on this overall part geometry (Schleich and Wartzack 2014). This simplifies the tolerance analysis for non-ideal complex workpiece shapes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He [16] proposed an assembly tolerance analysis and design method based on skin model shape. This method is highly accurate [15][16][17] but computationally expensive [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%