2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Discrete Element Method based-approach for arched masonry structures under blast loads

Abstract: Masonry structures are often characterized by complex, non-planar geometries. This is also the case for historical and monumental structures. Here we investigate the dynamic behaviour of non-standard, curvilinear masonry geometries, such as vaults, subjected to blast loading. We use the Discrete Element Method (DEM) for modelling the dynamic structural response to explosions. The approach allows considering the detailed mechanical and geometrical characteristics of masonry, as well as the inherent coupling bet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For their simulations, these authors adopted for their models cohesion values of 0.010 and 0.007 for the normal and tangential cohesion thresholds parameters respectively. Masi et al [35] adopted cohesion values ranging from 0.0 to 3.0 MPa to perform a sensitivity analysis of arched masonry structures under blast loads using or damaged mortar.…”
Section: Design Of Experiments (Doe)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For their simulations, these authors adopted for their models cohesion values of 0.010 and 0.007 for the normal and tangential cohesion thresholds parameters respectively. Masi et al [35] adopted cohesion values ranging from 0.0 to 3.0 MPa to perform a sensitivity analysis of arched masonry structures under blast loads using or damaged mortar.…”
Section: Design Of Experiments (Doe)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each surface, we account for the non-simultaneity of the load, the effects of surface rotation of the blocks, incident angle (Mach stem), and the relative distance between explosive and blocks, as for Method B. Following the approach in Vannucci et al (2017a); Masi et al (2020a) the position and the angle of incident of the front surface of blocks are used to computed the blast loads.…”
Section: B Appendix Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gabrielsen et al (1975); Keys and Clubley (2017); Li et al (2017); Michaloudis and Gebbeken (2019); Masi et al (2019a). Research activity for the dynamic response of ancient and classical stone monuments in a blast event is, at the moment, modest and insufficient to draw appropriate preservation strategies and in-situ protections Masi et al (2019aMasi et al ( , 2020a. This is due to the fact that blast testing of masonry structures is particularly challenging due to its mechanical properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the work carried out on the impact and blast response of masonry walls with a flat geometry, the behavior of curvilinear geometries under these types of loadings has not been widely studied, as indicated by Masi et al [16]. Their study is a rare example of research investigating the blast behavior of curved masonry structures, particularly vaults, using the discrete element method (DEM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%