AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum 2020
DOI: 10.2514/6.2020-0406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Discrete Adjoint Solver for Time-Domain Fluid-Structure Interaction Problems with Large Deformations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coupling these together, namely full 3D finite element models (FEM) with boundary-layer resolving computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solvers is not a trivial procedure and computationally demanding problem. Thus, usually, for high aspect ratio aircraft the first simplifying assumption comes on the structural side, employing one-dimensional beam models for slender wings which can be more easily coupled with the aerodynamic model [6,7]. Beam models capable of capturing the nonlinear effects resulting from large deformations and finite rotations are now standard use in aeroelasticity, with several models for geometrically exact beam formulations available, notably intrinsic [8], displacement-based [9], or strain-based [10], but also others such as the modal rotation method [11,12].…”
Section: A Low Speed Aeroelasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coupling these together, namely full 3D finite element models (FEM) with boundary-layer resolving computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solvers is not a trivial procedure and computationally demanding problem. Thus, usually, for high aspect ratio aircraft the first simplifying assumption comes on the structural side, employing one-dimensional beam models for slender wings which can be more easily coupled with the aerodynamic model [6,7]. Beam models capable of capturing the nonlinear effects resulting from large deformations and finite rotations are now standard use in aeroelasticity, with several models for geometrically exact beam formulations available, notably intrinsic [8], displacement-based [9], or strain-based [10], but also others such as the modal rotation method [11,12].…”
Section: A Low Speed Aeroelasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the results of steady state simulations, validated gradients for a simple unsteady CHT setup using the discrete adjoint method are implemented and available. The unsteady multizone adjoint requires additional care [2] in terms of implementation and especially objective function definition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%