1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2614(98)00198-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A discrepancy between experimental and theoretical thermochemical characterization of some oxygen fluorides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1,67 (6) Rotation of FOOF at the OO bond is equally as likely as dissociation into FOO and F because the corresponding barriers (cis barrier: 19.6 kcal/mol; dissociation barrier 19.5 kcal/mol) are comparable. Previous estimates as to the height of the rotational barriers of FOOF are largely exaggerated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,67 (6) Rotation of FOOF at the OO bond is equally as likely as dissociation into FOO and F because the corresponding barriers (cis barrier: 19.6 kcal/mol; dissociation barrier 19.5 kcal/mol) are comparable. Previous estimates as to the height of the rotational barriers of FOOF are largely exaggerated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] Moreover, Ventura and coworkers have successfully determined thermochemical properties of species, for which bonding patterns are difficult to describe with traditional ab initio techniques, using DFT methods. [19][20][21][22][23] For example, DFT was shown to rival or surpass CCSD(T) calculations in the study of fluorine oxides and sulfines. 24 In our laboratory, we have also demonstrated that DFT techniques can be used in the calculations of barrier heights of reactions with a first order saddle point leading to results as accurate as those obtained with conventional ab initio methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we can have an independent theoretical assessment of Δ f H ° 298K (HSO) to compare with the ab initio results already present in the literature. We have shown previously 33–39 that density functional methods using large basis sets and isodesmic reactions can produce very accurate thermochemical results, bettering G2 and even coupled cluster singles and doubles calculations with perturbative inclusion at triple excitation [CCSD(T)] methods in many cases. We expect that the results obtained for HSO employing this methodology will be of the same quality as those obtained before.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%