2000
DOI: 10.1063/1.533281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A direct theory for the perturbed unstable nonlinear Schrödinger equation

Abstract: A direct perturbation theory for the unstable nonlinear Schrödinger equation with perturbations is developed. The linearized operator is derived and the squared Jost functions are shown to be its eigenfunctions. Then the equation of linearized operator is transformed into an equivalent 4ϫ4 matrix form with first order derivative in t and the eigenfunctions into a four-component row. Adjoint functions and the inner product are defined. Orthogonality relations of these functions are derived and the expansion of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
13
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(9 reference statements)
4
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The principal purpose of this paper is to reconsider the perturbed UNS equation via a direct perturbation expansion and phase‐averaged “conservation balances” following the methods described by, for example, Kodama and Ablowitz [16] and Grimshaw [17, 18], respectively. Our results from both the direct perturbation expansion and conservation balance approaches, of course, completely agree with each other, but contradict Huang et al [13]. Moreover, in the context of the dissipative problem, we are able to explicitly determine the first‐order perturbation field.…”
Section: Introdutionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The principal purpose of this paper is to reconsider the perturbed UNS equation via a direct perturbation expansion and phase‐averaged “conservation balances” following the methods described by, for example, Kodama and Ablowitz [16] and Grimshaw [17, 18], respectively. Our results from both the direct perturbation expansion and conservation balance approaches, of course, completely agree with each other, but contradict Huang et al [13]. Moreover, in the context of the dissipative problem, we are able to explicitly determine the first‐order perturbation field.…”
Section: Introdutionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Indeed, this is the case for the dissipative perturbation example explicitly solved for later in this section. The results of this specific example can be directly compared with those in [13]. As we then show, the results so obtained do not agree with those in Huang et al [13].…”
Section: The Unstable Nonlinear Schrödinger Equationmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations