1998
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/31/33/005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A direct perturbation theory for dark solitons based on a complete set of the squared Jost solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
90
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
90
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, one still has an analytical description of the excitations around the stationary profile (51) because the expression of the excitation around a soliton is known (it is given by the squared Jost functions of the inverse problem [49], see also Appendix A of Ref. [50]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one still has an analytical description of the excitations around the stationary profile (51) because the expression of the excitation around a soliton is known (it is given by the squared Jost functions of the inverse problem [49], see also Appendix A of Ref. [50]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results for t 0 and s 0 are plotted in figure 7b. As mentioned earlier, previous attempts using IST are not adequate (Chen et al 1998;Lashkin 2004;Ao & Yan 2005). t 0 was not obtained in Kivshar & Yang (1994); furthermore, no previous work has considered the evolution of the parameter s 0 .…”
Section: Linear Dampingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…On the other hand, the integrable defocusing NLS model supports dark solitons which are intensity dips sitting on a continuous wave background (cwb) with a phase change across their intensity minimum. In order to apply to the dark soliton perturbation and the non-vanishing boundary conditions (nvbc), inherent to this type of solution, various improvements have been made to the calculations and methods [10][11][12] based on the so-called complete set of squared Jost solution (eigenstates of the linearised NLS operator). The implementation of direct methods, however, consider small perturbations around the integrable NLS model [8,13].…”
Section: Jhep03(2016)005mentioning
confidence: 99%