2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2016.09.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A direct discontinuous Galerkin method for the compressible Navier–Stokes equations on arbitrary grids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, where τ w is the local wall shear stress, on the airfoil surface are compared in Fig. 6 with the discontinuous Galerkin (DG) solution of the compressible NS equations [33]. Moreover, the comparison of the drag coefficient with other numerical results is shown in Table IV.…”
Section: A Accuracy Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, where τ w is the local wall shear stress, on the airfoil surface are compared in Fig. 6 with the discontinuous Galerkin (DG) solution of the compressible NS equations [33]. Moreover, the comparison of the drag coefficient with other numerical results is shown in Table IV.…”
Section: A Accuracy Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we will give some numerical test cases to prove the convergence of the proposed asymptotic expansions by comparing them with the corresponding numerical results obtained by the direct discontinuous Galerkin (DDG) method detailed in Liu and Yan, Cheng et al, and Zhang et al And we will also illustrate the utility of the asymptotic expansion solution for verification purpose by determining the accuracy order for the DDG method. In all cases, the boundary values will be chosen to satisfy S1>S0 so that the second law of thermodynamics will not be violated at least with respect to the inlet and outlet points.…”
Section: Verification and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the basic principle in defining the characteristic lengthh on arbitrary grids is that the characteristic lengthh should be associated with the target interface where the viscous flux is evaluated and also be orthogonal to the common interface or boundary face. A variety of different definitions had been tested in our previous work [25], and the one gives the best performance is given as follows:…”
Section: Review Of Original Direct Dg Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most remarkable feature of the DDG method is its simplicity in implementation and its efficiency in computational cost. Very recently, the DDG method has been successfully extended and applied for solving the more complex compressible Navier-Stokes equations [25,26] on arbitrary grids. The DDG method shows its potential to deliver comparable accuracy as the widely used BR2 method at a significantly reduced computational cost, thus, becomes an attractive alternative to discretize the compressible Navier-Stokes equations on arbitrary grids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%