2010
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2199-11-77
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A direct comparison of strategies for combinatorial RNA interference

Abstract: BackgroundCombinatorial RNA interference (co-RNAi) is a valuable tool for highly effective gene suppression of single and multiple-genes targets, and can be used to prevent the escape of mutation-prone transcripts. There are currently three main approaches used to achieve co-RNAi in animal cells; multiple promoter/shRNA cassettes, long hairpin RNAs (lhRNA) and miRNA-embedded shRNAs, however, the relative effectiveness of each is not known. The current study directly compares the ability of each co-RNAi method … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite these advances, siRNAs have been produced from both e-shRNA and lhRNA precursors in a gradient with the most abundant and active being at the end distal from the loop, resulting in reduced silencing for the second, third, and fourth siRNAs (128)(129)(130)(131) . It was also found that compared to other methods of co-RNAi, the same shRNA sequences were much less predictable when expressed as e-shRNAs and generally exhibited reduced silencing activity ( 141 ) . Nonetheless, these examples clearly show that these approaches can be very successfully used to initiate potent gene knockdown, particularly in the case of HIV.…”
Section: Combinatorialrnaimentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite these advances, siRNAs have been produced from both e-shRNA and lhRNA precursors in a gradient with the most abundant and active being at the end distal from the loop, resulting in reduced silencing for the second, third, and fourth siRNAs (128)(129)(130)(131) . It was also found that compared to other methods of co-RNAi, the same shRNA sequences were much less predictable when expressed as e-shRNAs and generally exhibited reduced silencing activity ( 141 ) . Nonetheless, these examples clearly show that these approaches can be very successfully used to initiate potent gene knockdown, particularly in the case of HIV.…”
Section: Combinatorialrnaimentioning
confidence: 98%
“…when expressed from a 4-cassette construct compared to single copy vectors ( 5 ) , but in a separate study, vectors encoding up to fi ve separate promoter/shRNA cassettes offered similar levels of gene knockdown compared to single shRNAs ( 141 ) . One potential hazard of this strategy was identi fi ed by the unwanted recombination and loss of identical promoter sequences cloned into lentiviral vectors, an event that was then avoided by using different promoter sequences ( 5 ) .…”
Section: Combinatorialrnaimentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cassettes that express multiple shRNA sequences allow for a combinatorial RNA interference approach, resulting in greater gene suppression than with single-shRNA cassettes [86][87][88][89]. The efficacy of shRNAs can be improved by incorporating mutations and increasing stem length [86,[90][91][92].…”
Section: Shrnasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This so-called combinatorial RNA interference (co-RNAi) is especially important for treating highly mutable viruses such as HIV-1 because they tend to escape from RNAi (2). There are three main strategies for using co-RNAi in antiviral gene therapy: (1) multiple promoter/shRNA cassettes; (2) long hairpin RNAs; and (3) microRNA-embedded shRNAs (35). In this paper we describe a protocol for generation of shRNA cassettes that express several shRNAs under a single promoter in human cultured cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%