2016
DOI: 10.1515/jnma-2015-0048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A direct algorithm in some free boundary problems

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper we propose a new algorithm for the well known elliptic obstacle problem and for parabolic variational inequalities like one and two phase Stefan problem and of obstacle type. Our approach enters the category of fixed domain methods and solves just linear elliptic or parabolic equations and their discretization at each iteration. We prove stability and convergence properties. The approximating coincidence set is explicitly computed and it converges in the Hausdorff-Pompeiu sense to the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [18], we have tested numerically with positive results the stability of a similar algorithm when f the right-hand side in (1) is perturbed. Test 2.…”
Section: Numerical Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [18], we have tested numerically with positive results the stability of a similar algorithm when f the right-hand side in (1) is perturbed. Test 2.…”
Section: Numerical Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we need just a scalar penalization parameter in our method. A similar strategy was employed in [18] for the elliptic unilateral obstacle problem and for parabolic variational inequalities. Our approach is inspired from shape optimization techniques, but no shape optimization problem is used here although this is a known method in free boundary problems, [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unknowns to be found are the position, the shape, the size, the number of the holes defining the optimal plate and the given thickness is assumed constant. The main tools that we use is the fictitious domain approach Neittaanmäki, Pennanen, Tiba [13], Neittaanmäki, Tiba [15], Halanay, Murea, Tiba [6], Murea, Tiba [12] and the control variational method, Barboteu, Sofonea, Tiba [2], Sofonea, Tiba [18], Neittaanmäki, Sprekels, Tiba [14] and their references.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the setting of variational inequalities and free boundary problems, applications of such ideas have been recently discussed in Halanay, Murea and Tiba (2013), (2016), Murea and Tiba (2016) with reference to elliptic or parabolic obstacle problems, one or two phase Stefan problems, fluid-solid contact models. As examples of applications that may be handled via the fixed domain methods, we mention as well the electrochemical machining process Neittaanmaki, Sprekels and Tiba (2006) or various contact problems related to the deformation of the elastic membranes with obstacle, melting or solidification processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As examples of applications that may be handled via the fixed domain methods, we mention as well the electrochemical machining process Neittaanmaki, Sprekels and Tiba (2006) or various contact problems related to the deformation of the elastic membranes with obstacle, melting or solidification processes. Applications to financial models (the two-asset American options) are also investigated in Murea and Tiba (2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%