2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2005.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dip in the chlorophyll fluorescence induction at 0.2–2 s in Trebouxia-possessing lichens reflects a fast reoxidation of photosystem I. A comparison with higher plants

Abstract: An unusual dip (compared to higher plant behaviour under comparable light conditions) in chlorophyll fluorescence induction (FI) at about 0.2-2 s was observed for thalli of several lichen species having Trebouxia species (the most common symbiotic green algae) as their native photobionts and for Trebouxia species cultured separately in nutrient solution. This dip appears after the usual O(J)IP transient at a wide range of excitation light intensities (100-1800 micromol photons m(-2) s(-1)). Simultaneous measur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The P step measured at high intensity of excitation light splits into two steps (H and G) in the fluorescence curve (TsimilliMichael et al 1998). The fluorescence decrease from H step to a dip between H and G steps is caused by a removal of limitation on the acceptor side of PS I (Ilik et al 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The P step measured at high intensity of excitation light splits into two steps (H and G) in the fluorescence curve (TsimilliMichael et al 1998). The fluorescence decrease from H step to a dip between H and G steps is caused by a removal of limitation on the acceptor side of PS I (Ilik et al 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we found Arabidopsis plants expressing maize FNR1, FNR2, and FNR3 are respectively enriched in FNR bound to TROL, Tic62, and in soluble FNR, we compared their PET capacity, to gain further insight into this question. There are early reports that FNR is the likely point of light regulation at the reducing side of PSI on light induction (Satoh and Katoh, 1980;Satoh, 1982), and more recent articles have provided further evidence that FNR may regulate PET (Ilík et al, 2006;Joliot and Johnson, 2011) and that this might be dependent on the NADP + /NADPH ratio (Rajagopal et al, 2003;Hald et al, 2008). In addition, FNR membrane association is known to change during dark-to-light transitions: FNR bound to Tic62 is released at basic pH values that could be generated in PET (Alte et al, 2010), and interaction with thylakoid Tic62-and TROL-mediated complexes is reported to be disrupted in the light (Benz et al, 2009).…”
Section: Fnr Location Influences Electron Transport Around the Photosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nomenclature for 'OJIP' is O for origin or F 0 level measured at 20-50µs after illumination, J and I are intermediate states measured after 2ms and 30 ms, and P is the peak or F M (maximal fluorescence). In contrast to the angiosperms, the foraminifers, zooxanthellae and lichens, show an additional G peak and H (=P) peak (Tsimilli-Michael et al, 1998;Ilik et al, 2006). The origin G peak is assigned to an early activation of the ferredoxin-NADP+-reductase, FNR, (Ilik et al, 2006).…”
Section: Fast Chlorophyll Fluorescencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the angiosperms, the foraminifers, zooxanthellae and lichens, show an additional G peak and H (=P) peak (Tsimilli-Michael et al, 1998;Ilik et al, 2006). The origin G peak is assigned to an early activation of the ferredoxin-NADP+-reductase, FNR, (Ilik et al, 2006). In heat-stressed samples, another peak arises between F 0 and F J at 300 µs which is designated as K peak (Guisse et al, 1995;Srivastava et al, 1997;Strasser, 1997;Misra et al, 2001bMisra et al, , 2007.…”
Section: Fast Chlorophyll Fluorescencementioning
confidence: 99%