2020
DOI: 10.1080/14789949.2020.1836251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A dimensional framework for the use of ASPD in SVP civil commitment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Possibilities include that evidence for some of the ASPD criteria (i.e., conduct disorder prior to age 15) are not typically available in the provided criminal records, making the diagnosis more difficult if the evaluee denies such history. ASPD appears to have been rarely used as a sole qualifying mental disorder in California SVP proceedings (J Rokop, personal communication, 2/5/21), possibly because of controversies around its linkage to the predisposition of criminal sexual acts (e.g., Rokop et al, 2021). Given this, evaluators may have differed in their understanding and analysis of the appropriateness of ASPD as a qualifying disorder.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Possibilities include that evidence for some of the ASPD criteria (i.e., conduct disorder prior to age 15) are not typically available in the provided criminal records, making the diagnosis more difficult if the evaluee denies such history. ASPD appears to have been rarely used as a sole qualifying mental disorder in California SVP proceedings (J Rokop, personal communication, 2/5/21), possibly because of controversies around its linkage to the predisposition of criminal sexual acts (e.g., Rokop et al, 2021). Given this, evaluators may have differed in their understanding and analysis of the appropriateness of ASPD as a qualifying disorder.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASPD has a somewhat more controversial history in SVP evaluations than Pedophilic Disorder (Lee et al, 2019; Rokop et al, 2021; Sreenivasan et al, 2020; Vognsen & Phenix, 2004). Some states accept it as a qualifying diagnosis, while others do not (e.g., New York).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the dimensional model turned out to be too complex for clinical practice in the developmental phase of the DSM-5 ( Krueger and Markon, 2014 ), meaning that in line with earlier versions of the DSM, ASPD sustained to be defined with mainly behavioral criteria. Several authors mentioned that the behavioral criteria used for classifying ASPD are just a limited representation of the complexity of ASPD and its underlying etiologies ( Brazil et al, 2018 ; Jurjako et al, 2020 ; Münch et al, 2020 ; Rokop et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%