2017
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrd.2017.2650480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Digital Frequency Adaptive Synchronization Unit for On- and Off-Grid Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, because grid synchronisation is a major application of ZC detection, a comparative study of the proposed ZC detection technique with other state-of-the-art grid synchronisation methods was carried out, as presented in Table 1. The data on the other grid synchronisation techniques shown in Table 1 are obtained from [11] and hence the simulation conditions are not similar. The response time of the proposed system after implementation was found to be 14.4 µs.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, because grid synchronisation is a major application of ZC detection, a comparative study of the proposed ZC detection technique with other state-of-the-art grid synchronisation methods was carried out, as presented in Table 1. The data on the other grid synchronisation techniques shown in Table 1 are obtained from [11] and hence the simulation conditions are not similar. The response time of the proposed system after implementation was found to be 14.4 µs.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the findings suggest that the proposed method can be suitably incorporated into the digital control of various processes included in the ever-expanding electrical power systems. [20] 40-60 40 ms N/P E-PLL [21] 30-90 50 ms 5 FRF-PLL [22] 38-62 50 ms 15 SOGI-QSG [23] 0.05-100 11-23 ms N/P MDSOGI-FLL [24] 40-60 40-60 ms 5 LES PLL [25] N/P 40 ms 10 T/4 DELAY PLL [26] 49-51 100 ms 0.8 FASU [11] 40-2000 30 ms 80 proposed method 49-51 100 µs 1…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation