2014 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems 2014
DOI: 10.1109/incos.2014.118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Digital Forensics Profiling Methodology for the Cyberstalker

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different digital offence types inherently maintain different evidential digital traits (Horsman et al, 2014; Silde & Angelopoulou, 2014). Therefore, standardization between different offence types where evidential traits may be different, could be a difficult task.…”
Section: More Focused Standardization Attemptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different digital offence types inherently maintain different evidential digital traits (Horsman et al, 2014; Silde & Angelopoulou, 2014). Therefore, standardization between different offence types where evidential traits may be different, could be a difficult task.…”
Section: More Focused Standardization Attemptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, where offence s of the same type may share similar evidential traits (e.g., illegal imagery cases will focus on media files), consistent approaches may be justifiable for replication across multiple cases of the same offence , and in turn, be achievable. Such thoughts may be considered in line with the concept of “digital profiling,” where consistent behaviors found in specific crime types may allow standard investigative approaches to be adopted (Silde & Angelopoulou, 2014).…”
Section: More Focused Standardization Attemptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silde and Angelopoulou (Silde & Angelopoulou, 2014) proposed a Cyberstalker profiling methodology by integrating BEA into a traditional DF investigation framework. This model involved three steps:…”
Section: The 3-stage Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%