Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Dwikat et al. v. The Government of Israel et al. (not yet published) (The Eilon Moreh decision)This decision was the result of a petition brought by 17 residents of the Arab village of Rogeeb near Nablus on the West Bank for an order that the seizure of their lands to establish the Jewish settlement of Eilon Moreh had been illegal and therefore, that the settlement must be dismantled. 1 On June 7, 1979, the settlers, aided by the army and heavy earth-moving equipment, moved onto the settlement site near Nablus. Two days before that, the regional army commander of the West Bank had signed an order confiscating the property "for military needs", and on June 20, the High Court of Justice granted an order nisi and a temporary injunction forbidding additional expansion of the infant settlement. Representatives of the settlers were later joined as additional respondents.The legal framework for the decision in this case had been set forth in a 1978 opinion of the court concerning the seizure of land for another West Bank settlement, that of Beit-El. 2 It was then unanimously decided by the panel of five justices (Landau
Dwikat et al. v. The Government of Israel et al. (not yet published) (The Eilon Moreh decision)This decision was the result of a petition brought by 17 residents of the Arab village of Rogeeb near Nablus on the West Bank for an order that the seizure of their lands to establish the Jewish settlement of Eilon Moreh had been illegal and therefore, that the settlement must be dismantled. 1 On June 7, 1979, the settlers, aided by the army and heavy earth-moving equipment, moved onto the settlement site near Nablus. Two days before that, the regional army commander of the West Bank had signed an order confiscating the property "for military needs", and on June 20, the High Court of Justice granted an order nisi and a temporary injunction forbidding additional expansion of the infant settlement. Representatives of the settlers were later joined as additional respondents.The legal framework for the decision in this case had been set forth in a 1978 opinion of the court concerning the seizure of land for another West Bank settlement, that of Beit-El. 2 It was then unanimously decided by the panel of five justices (Landau
In this article we will attempt to clarify a number of basic constitutional principles as they are reflected in the Israeli system of civil procedure. In so doing, we do not purport to be exhaustive as to the constitutional principles discussed. Rather, we will be selective, and shall place our emphasis on those principles that are most basic to the Israeli system. First, however, we must briefly describe the Israeli constitutional structure. Israel has no written constitution. Nor do any of the Basic Laws, which have a quasi-constitutional standing, specifically treat the issues discussed in this article. Yet, this does not mean that constitutional principles do not influence civil procedure in Israel.First, it should be noted that many constitutional principles, in the broad meaning of this term, i.e., fundamental, structural principles, are embedded in positive Israeli legislative provisions, both of primary and of secondary legislation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.