2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2017.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A diffuse interface method for the Navier–Stokes/Darcy equations: Perfusion profile for a patient-specific human liver based on MRI scans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With these considerations in mind, we derive a second diffuse variant of Nitsche's method, where we consider only phase-field approximations for the boundary surface integrals, but leave the volume integrals in sharp format. Starting from the geometrically diffuse formulation (22) and (23) and corresponding finite element discretizations illustrated in Figure 5, we convert all diffuse volume terms back to their sharp representation by replacing the phase-field function by its sharp boundary limit H in the sense of (16). The resulting sharp domain, but diffuse boundary formulation, follows as find u h such that…”
Section: Diffuse Boundary But Sharp Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With these considerations in mind, we derive a second diffuse variant of Nitsche's method, where we consider only phase-field approximations for the boundary surface integrals, but leave the volume integrals in sharp format. Starting from the geometrically diffuse formulation (22) and (23) and corresponding finite element discretizations illustrated in Figure 5, we convert all diffuse volume terms back to their sharp representation by replacing the phase-field function by its sharp boundary limit H in the sense of (16). The resulting sharp domain, but diffuse boundary formulation, follows as find u h such that…”
Section: Diffuse Boundary But Sharp Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Neumann‐type boundary and interface conditions, this strategy leads to a straightforward phase‐field approximation. () For Dirichlet‐type constraints, most of the attention has been focused on penalty‐type approaches. ()…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, many scientists and engineers have investigated the fluid flow interaction between the conduit and porous media regime . The massive applications, such as karst aquifer subsurface flow system, interaction between the surface flows and subsurface flows, petroleum extraction, industrial filtration, biochemical transport, field flow fractionation for separation and characterization of proteins, blood flow in arteries and veins, etc, attract scientists and engineers to build related fluid dynamical models, including (Navier‐)Stokes‐Darcy model, Stokes‐Darcy‐transport model, Darcy‐Stokes‐Brinkman model, etc . It is not surprising that a great deal of effort has been devoted to develop appropriate numerical methods to solve the (Navier‐)Stokes‐Darcy fluid flow system, including coupled finite element methods, domain decomposition methods, Lagrange multiplier methods, mortar finite element methods, least‐square methods, partitioned time‐stepping methods, two‐grid and multigrid methods, discontinuous Galerkin finite element methods, boundary integral methods, and many others …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buoso et al introduced a parameterized reduced‐order method for the noninvasive functional evaluation of coronary artery diseases 8 . Stoter et al used the Navier‐Stokes/Darcy equations to simulate the blood flow of a patient‐specific human liver 9 . Some recent reviews of patient‐specific blood flow simulations can be found in References 10 and 11.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%