2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2014.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A differential prey response to invasive lionfish, Pterois volitans: Prey naiveté and risk-sensitive courtship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, many authors have surmised that the na€ ıve prey hypothesis-in which native species do not recognize the threat posed by the lionfish's unique appearance and stalking behavior and fail to evade approaches by themexplains the high rates of native prey consumption by lionfish in the invaded range (Albins and Hixon 2013, Côt e and Maljkovi c 2010, Cure et al 2012, Côt e et al 2013a, Marsh-Hunkin et al 2013, Black et al 2014, Kindinger 2015, Anton et al 2016, Eaton et al 2016, Benkwitt 2017. In particular, many authors have surmised that the na€ ıve prey hypothesis-in which native species do not recognize the threat posed by the lionfish's unique appearance and stalking behavior and fail to evade approaches by themexplains the high rates of native prey consumption by lionfish in the invaded range (Albins and Hixon 2013, Côt e and Maljkovi c 2010, Cure et al 2012, Côt e et al 2013a, Marsh-Hunkin et al 2013, Black et al 2014, Kindinger 2015, Anton et al 2016, Eaton et al 2016, Benkwitt 2017.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, many authors have surmised that the na€ ıve prey hypothesis-in which native species do not recognize the threat posed by the lionfish's unique appearance and stalking behavior and fail to evade approaches by themexplains the high rates of native prey consumption by lionfish in the invaded range (Albins and Hixon 2013, Côt e and Maljkovi c 2010, Cure et al 2012, Côt e et al 2013a, Marsh-Hunkin et al 2013, Black et al 2014, Kindinger 2015, Anton et al 2016, Eaton et al 2016, Benkwitt 2017. In particular, many authors have surmised that the na€ ıve prey hypothesis-in which native species do not recognize the threat posed by the lionfish's unique appearance and stalking behavior and fail to evade approaches by themexplains the high rates of native prey consumption by lionfish in the invaded range (Albins and Hixon 2013, Côt e and Maljkovi c 2010, Cure et al 2012, Côt e et al 2013a, Marsh-Hunkin et al 2013, Black et al 2014, Kindinger 2015, Anton et al 2016, Eaton et al 2016, Benkwitt 2017.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Kindinger (2015) showed that territorial 3-spot damselfish, Stegastes planifrons, that responded aggressively to all native fishes had reactions to captive lionfish that did not differ from the response toward empty controls. In contrast, Black et al (2014) demonstrated, using another native Atlantic pomacentrid, S. leucostictus, that native prey can recognize and respond with anti-predator behavior in the presence of lionfish. However, this prey species did not modify their high-risk courtship behavior in the presence of the invader (Black et al 2014), a result that suggests that other prey may similarly increase their risk predation when managing tradeoffs with foraging and/or reproductive demands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In contrast, Black et al (2014) demonstrated, using another native Atlantic pomacentrid, S. leucostictus, that native prey can recognize and respond with anti-predator behavior in the presence of lionfish. However, this prey species did not modify their high-risk courtship behavior in the presence of the invader (Black et al 2014), a result that suggests that other prey may similarly increase their risk predation when managing tradeoffs with foraging and/or reproductive demands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations