2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.10.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A differential pattern of neural response toward sad versus happy facial expressions in major depressive disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

49
394
4
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 575 publications
(461 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
49
394
4
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, across studies using an identical paradigm, we have identified neurobiological markers that distinguish healthy transient mood effects from pathological depressive mood on executive function. A couple of studies , Surguladze et al, 2005, Fu et al, 2007 have reported different patterns of neural response to sad and happy facial expressions in MDD. Given the features of negative attentional bias and anhedonia (lack of pleasure) of MDD, one might predict that a happy stimulus might produce a less distractive effect on the performance of attentional targets detection in the MDD group relative to controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, across studies using an identical paradigm, we have identified neurobiological markers that distinguish healthy transient mood effects from pathological depressive mood on executive function. A couple of studies , Surguladze et al, 2005, Fu et al, 2007 have reported different patterns of neural response to sad and happy facial expressions in MDD. Given the features of negative attentional bias and anhedonia (lack of pleasure) of MDD, one might predict that a happy stimulus might produce a less distractive effect on the performance of attentional targets detection in the MDD group relative to controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explore the role of antidepressant medication, patients were grouped into a low-dose group (medication level 1-2, n ¼ 12) and a high-dose group (medication level 3-4, n ¼ 16) (Surguladze et al, 2005). High-and low-dose group did not differ with respect to 5-HTTLPR risk group (w 2 (1) ¼ 0.0, p ¼ 1.0) and amygdala activity elicited by any masked emotion type (all p40.2).…”
Section: Role Of Medicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 A number of studies have demonstrated increased amygdalar responses in activation paradigms for those with mood disorders. [22][23][24] Interestingly, it has recently been reported that healthy carriers of the short (s) allele of the functional promoter polymorphism for the serotonin transporter gene (a finding that confers increased risk of depression) exhibit amygdalar hyperactivity. [25][26][27] One significant function of the amygdala is to evaluate the emotional valence-be it positive 28 or negative 29 -31 -of an experience.…”
Section: Functional Anatomy Of Mood Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%