2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A differential game for basin ecological compensation mechanism based on cross-regional government-enterprise cooperation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Marketization of ecological compensation is promoting in China, with the intention of strengthening the role of the market. In the process of market transactions, it is crucial to focus on inter‐regional government–enterprise coordination and local government–enterprise cooperation (Ding et al, 2022), making ecological compensation between north and south fairer and more effective. In addition, from the view of supply–demand ESs, building ES management to enhance well‐being is the key to achieving regional sustainable development (Wang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marketization of ecological compensation is promoting in China, with the intention of strengthening the role of the market. In the process of market transactions, it is crucial to focus on inter‐regional government–enterprise coordination and local government–enterprise cooperation (Ding et al, 2022), making ecological compensation between north and south fairer and more effective. In addition, from the view of supply–demand ESs, building ES management to enhance well‐being is the key to achieving regional sustainable development (Wang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-cooperative games are more susceptible to information dominance by players, which may lead to an uneven distribution of eco-compensation among stakeholders [20]. Accordingly, related studies have introduced the cooperative game, i.e., all players form an interest alliance to maximize the eco-compensation of a watershed, aiming to improve the water quality and water use efficiency [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, continuing to subsidize becomes more of a financial burden. For this reason, Ding et al [20] proposed a game model regarding government-business cooperation to enhance the sustainability of compensation based on environmental performance targets. However, the effectiveness of cooperative games can be limited by differences in watershed economic development, pollution control, and management models, that make it difficult to achieve a long-term and solid alliance [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial administrative boundaries cannot impede the spread of regional environmental issues, and the governance of water pollution is not solely the concern of individual cities. In the face of complex regional environmental governance challenges, it requires collaborative efforts among governments across regions [15,16]. Thus, the establishment of a cooperative governance mechanism involving multiple cities, departments, and regions is a necessary strategy for addressing water pollution issues [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%