2002
DOI: 10.1002/fld.348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A differential equation for approximate wall distance

Abstract: SUMMARYA partial di erential equation to compute the distance from a surface is derived and solved numerically. The beneÿt of such a formulation especially in combination with turbulence models is shown. The details of the formulation as well as several examples demonstrating the in uence of its parameters are presented. The proposed formulation has computational advantages and can be favourably incorporated into one-and two-equation turbulence models like e.g. the Spalart-Allmaras, the Secundov or Menter's SS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is gotten by the solution of a partial differential equation [12,13,14] , which can be combined with turbulence models and can get more exact normal distance than calculating the minimum distance between discrete points on the wall and the points in the domain if the grid lines are not orthogonal to the surface. The partial differential equation used in this paper is based on the equation derived by Fares [14] .…”
Section: Computations Of Wall Distancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is gotten by the solution of a partial differential equation [12,13,14] , which can be combined with turbulence models and can get more exact normal distance than calculating the minimum distance between discrete points on the wall and the points in the domain if the grid lines are not orthogonal to the surface. The partial differential equation used in this paper is based on the equation derived by Fares [14] .…”
Section: Computations Of Wall Distancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the new model doesn't require the wall distance. The startup distance calculation is therefore not necessary, which can be expensive in the case of complicated 3D geometries [11]. Using the same stability CFL limit and achieving almost similar convergence rates during the calculation the difference in the CPU time between simulations using the S A and the proposed model was within 4%.…”
Section: Numerical Robustness and Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The nearest normal wall distance, d, is a key parameter in many turbulence modeling and simulation approaches [1,2] and also in peripheral applications incorporating additional solution physics [3,4]. Such examples include explosive front, multiphase flow and electrostatic particle force modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%