1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.1987.00017.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Dialogical Approach to Understanding: Horizontal Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It repudiates the traditional egg-crate structure of schools. Teachers are encouraged to form relationships that enable school change to be based on a joint inquiry into what is really best for the students (Gitlin & Goldstein, 1987).…”
Section: The Collegial Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It repudiates the traditional egg-crate structure of schools. Teachers are encouraged to form relationships that enable school change to be based on a joint inquiry into what is really best for the students (Gitlin & Goldstein, 1987).…”
Section: The Collegial Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collegial evaluation utilizes several approaches, including communication analysis (prejudgments are uncovered), historical perspective (clarification of how past events and ideology may explain the existence of current actions and related beliefs), and alternatives for achieving desired intentions (implications of taking a different educational approach) (Gitlin & Goldstein, 1987). Use of challenge statements are suggested to push dialogue beyond simple clarification of values and prejudgments to the point where issues of rightness can be raised.…”
Section: The Collegial Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We are equally concerned, however, with creating alternative teaching practices capable of empowering students both inside and outside schools. (p. 229) Other contemporary reconstructionist teacher education efforts in the U.S. include the work of Adler and Goodman (1986), who have used social studies methods courses to help prospective teachers develop curriculum analysis and development capabilities that will contribute to more democratic school contexts, the &dquo;emancipatory&dquo; supervision methods developed by Gitlin and Smyth (1989), our own work in developing an inquiry-oriented student teaching program (Zeichner & Liston, 1987), several feministinspired proposals for teacher education programs that seek the correction of gender inequities in . schools and society (e.g., Maher & Rathbone, 1986), and proposals like those of Ginsburg (1988) that call for more political activity by teacher educators (see Liston & Zeichner, in press).…”
Section: The Social Reconstructionist Traditionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Reduction of teachers to deskilled technicians and problems of accreditation of teachers continue to be problems (e.g. Gitlin & Goldstein, 1987;Hatton, 1988;Smyth, 1988;Gore, 1990). Eddy's signalling of these issues is again indicative of her foresight.…”
Section: Bureaucratic Context Of Teachingmentioning
confidence: 98%