1964
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1964.26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A diallel cross of genotypes and genotrophs of Linum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

1965
1965
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Not only is this pattern characteristic of the inheritance of these two characters in crosses between conventionally derived inbred lines of N. rustica (Mather and Jinks, 1971) but there is segregation both in the F2 and F3 generations of the conventional kind. This is similar to the situation in flax (Durrant and Tyson, 1964).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Not only is this pattern characteristic of the inheritance of these two characters in crosses between conventionally derived inbred lines of N. rustica (Mather and Jinks, 1971) but there is segregation both in the F2 and F3 generations of the conventional kind. This is similar to the situation in flax (Durrant and Tyson, 1964).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…In both the F1 and F2 generations the S x L reciprocal cross shows greater variation than the Lx S cross (Durrant, 1962b). In the F2 of crosses between L and S and other varieties of flax and linseed the larger variation which is found to be associated with the S genotype is paternally inherited and the smaller variation of the L genotype is maternally inherited (Durrant and Tyson, 1964).…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…cross with Linum Durrant and Tyson (1964) have described a diallel cross between six types of Linum comprising two flax genotypes, P and M, two linseed TABLE 7 Mean family variances (x zo) of log plant weights of F,families in a diallel cross of genotypes and genotrophs of Linum (Durrant and Tyson, 1964) genotypes, R and D, and two genotrophs, L and S. Table 7 gives the F2 family variances of the log, plant weights. Hayman's (1954) analysis, table 9 (a), shows that the residual reciprocal differences are larger than the array reciprocal differences.…”
Section: --Eg'mentioning
confidence: 99%