2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A diagnostic meta-analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) algorithm scoring method as a screen for depression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
436
2
13

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 551 publications
(466 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
12
436
2
13
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no significant difference between LLMD patients and controls regarding age (depressed, 7168 years vs. controls, 7168 years; z = -0.146, p = 0.884) and gender distribution (depressed, 91% female vs. controls, 86% female; w 2 = 0.790, p = 0.374). As expected, depressed patients scored significantly higher in the GDS-15 (LLMD: median = 11, 25th-75th percentile [8][9][10][11][12][13] ; controls: 1, Figure 1 shows the ROC analysis of the accuracy of GDS-15, PHQ-9, and HDRS-17 to identify a major depressive episode in this sample of older adults without neurocognitive disorders. Sensitivity and specificity were X 90% for all the scales (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was no significant difference between LLMD patients and controls regarding age (depressed, 7168 years vs. controls, 7168 years; z = -0.146, p = 0.884) and gender distribution (depressed, 91% female vs. controls, 86% female; w 2 = 0.790, p = 0.374). As expected, depressed patients scored significantly higher in the GDS-15 (LLMD: median = 11, 25th-75th percentile [8][9][10][11][12][13] ; controls: 1, Figure 1 shows the ROC analysis of the accuracy of GDS-15, PHQ-9, and HDRS-17 to identify a major depressive episode in this sample of older adults without neurocognitive disorders. Sensitivity and specificity were X 90% for all the scales (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Despite having good sensitivity and specificity for the identification of major depression in young adults, few studies have evaluated its accuracy for identification of LLMD. 9 Similarly, the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) is often employed in the assessment of depressive symptoms in clinical populations, with good sensitivity and specificity to identify major depressive episodes in young adults; however, few studies have addressed the accuracy of the HDRS for LLMD. 10 Because the diagnosis of depression is often overlooked in the elderly, it is essential to have accurate instruments to identify this disorder in clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instrument yields individual scores ranging from 0 to 27, with higher number indicating more severe depressive symptoms. Validation studies of the PHQ-9 have shown the instrument to be internally consistent and highly correlated with clinical diagnosis of MDD (Diez-Quevedo et al, 2001;Löwe et al, 2004;Manea et al, 2015), and it has shown high internal consistency in previous research (α = .84; Eisenberg et al, 2011b) and in the present sample (α = .87). In the current study, we categorized presence of MDD using the cutoff score of PHQ-9 equal to 10, which has been shown to have adequate sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing MDD Manea et al, 2015;Manea et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…It is possible that our cutoff score of PHQ-9 equal to 10 may have included students with MDD as well as with minor depression. We opted to use this cutoff score because it has shown to be more sensitive to MDD diagnoses than other methods (e.g., the PHQ-9 algorithm; Manea et al, 2015). Third, a response rate of approximately 25% of potential students who answered the survey may have introduced biases into the data.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A score of at least two (i.e. more than half the days) on a 4-point scale (0–3) is sufficient to qualify as a symptom, with the exception of the suicidal ideation item (counted as a symptom if scored 1 or greater) (Manea, Gilbody, & McMillan, 2015). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%