2019
DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A diagnostic classification version of Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire using diagnostic classification models

Abstract: Objective To obtain more precise and rich information from the measurements for schizotypal personality disorder (SPD), a cutting‐edge psychometric theory called diagnostic classification models (DCMs) was first employed in the present study to develop a diagnostic classification version of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (DC‐SPQ) based on the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Methods Under the framework of DCMs, 980 college students were recruited to calibra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(96 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The subject of the study was the changes in this period (psychotic decompensation), which concerned patients with schizophrenia who experienced a clear deterioration of their condition in terms of clinical symptoms. Due to the indications appearing in the literature of the heterogeneity of clinical symptoms of the classified groups of patients and the possibility of determining of the schizotypes resulting from different causative factors (a diagnostic approach based on causative factors facilitating the classification) [ 36 ], we decided to link the observed changes of marked clinical deterioration with the areas of individual brain structures in terms of cellular metabolism with simultaneous changes in peripheral markers in both analyzed groups. In the aspect of the multifactorial nature of schizophrenia, it seems important to link the above-mentioned factors that may also coexist among healthy people or people with personality disorders with central changes [ 37 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subject of the study was the changes in this period (psychotic decompensation), which concerned patients with schizophrenia who experienced a clear deterioration of their condition in terms of clinical symptoms. Due to the indications appearing in the literature of the heterogeneity of clinical symptoms of the classified groups of patients and the possibility of determining of the schizotypes resulting from different causative factors (a diagnostic approach based on causative factors facilitating the classification) [ 36 ], we decided to link the observed changes of marked clinical deterioration with the areas of individual brain structures in terms of cellular metabolism with simultaneous changes in peripheral markers in both analyzed groups. In the aspect of the multifactorial nature of schizophrenia, it seems important to link the above-mentioned factors that may also coexist among healthy people or people with personality disorders with central changes [ 37 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, predominance of the SPQ stands out, as it is used in more than half of the researches reviewed, and it has a wide acceptance in clinical, subclinical, and general populations ( Torbet et al, 2015 ) that extends to its short versions SPQ-B, SPQ-BR ( Callaway et al, 2014 ; Mitchell and Cohen, 2017 ), demonstrating capacity of adaptation to the advances of current models, such as the DC-SPQ structure developed for DSM 5 ( Xi, et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible explanation is that the two studies used different indicators to assess psychological outcomes. Schizotypal personality features in our study are a latent and deep psychological construct and are considered a prototype characterized by impairments in identity, self-direction, empathy, and/or intimacy, along with specific maladaptive traits in the domains of psychoticism and detachment ( 40 ), which reflect the comprehensive and lasting effect of the pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%