2010
DOI: 10.1080/09644010903574509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘A diabolical challenge’: public opinion and climate change policy in Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
46
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
46
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Climate change and agriculture have a unique relationship, which is well documented in the literature [1][2][3]. This particularly prevalent with regards to its influence on agricultural activities and subsequent crop yields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Climate change and agriculture have a unique relationship, which is well documented in the literature [1][2][3]. This particularly prevalent with regards to its influence on agricultural activities and subsequent crop yields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The way in which individuals (including farmers) and societies respond to climate change has been closely linked to community perceptions of climate variability, as well as other consequences [1][2][3]. As such, a lucid understanding of smallholder farmers' perceptions regarding climate variability, and how they influence their farming practices, is of critical importance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was supported by Humphreys (2007) and Spash (2010) Public preferences for the ETS have been found to be divided. Pietsch and McAllister (2010) found in their survey of 1000 participants that the ETS was positively received by the majority (58%) of the Australians. While 29% strongly favoured the scheme, 22% also strongly opposed the ETS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant portion of citizens currently dispute climate change estimates, including biophysical effects and sea level rise predictions (Alexander et al in press;Climate Institute 2010;Hulme 2009). Public debate has escalated and in many instances has polarised in response to mass media involvement and political partisanship, biasing representations of the impacts of emission trading schemes (ETSs) and casting doubt on economic implications (Pietsch and McAllister, 2010;Spash, 2010). The opinions of climate change sceptics have been found to impact the course of public debate on climate mitigation strategies (Climate Institute 2010; Leviston and Walker 2010;Nerlich 2010;Oreskes and Conway 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation