The site(s) of action of a bovine pituitary diabetogenic peptide that produces hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia in vivo (dogs or humans) was investigated in vitro. When rat diaphragms were incubated with the peptide in the presence of insulin, the peptide depressed insulin-mediated (a) glucose uptake, (b) glycogen synthesis, and (c) glycogen synthase activation (conversion of D to I form). Incubation with the peptide alone resulted in small increases in (a), (b), and (c). Insulin-mediated glycogen synthase kinase inactivation was inhibited when both insulin and peptide were present (d), whereas glycogen synthase kinase activity was lowered by the peptide alone. High doses of insulin completely reversed inhibitory effects of the peptide on glycogen synthesis. Therefore, the hyperglycemic and anti-insulin properties of this peptide in vivo can possibly be explained by the partial blocking action of the peptide on insulin-mediated glucose uptake and glycogenesis.In 1963, Louis et al.(1) first reported the isolation of a polypeptide exhibiting diabetogenic and anti-insulin properties from urine of human lipoatrophic diabetics. This peptide was not found in the urine of normal subjects. A similar peptide was subsequently isolated from urine of proteinuric diabetic patients without lipoatrophy (2), as well as from adenohypophyses of beef (3), sheep, pigs (4), and humans (5). All peptides produce hyperglycemia and resistance to exogenous insulin when injected into dogs and humans. After purification to homogeneity, all exhibit similar physicochemical and biological properties (5).The evidence that the pituitary peptide is not growth hormone or a fragment is: first, that it has no growth-promoting activity (6); second, no fragment of growth hormone with diabetogenic activity was isolated when growth hormone was subjected to the same isolation and purification procedures as the peptide (7); and third, there was little or no immunological crossreactivity between growth hormone antiserum and the peptide (5, 8). Evidence also suggests that this peptide is not adrenocorticotrophic hormone (3) or prolactin (4). Therefore, the suggestion has been made that this is a novel pituitary peptide (7).Since the biological effects of the peptide in vivo suggested an action antagonistic to insulin, we decided to examine this question directly in vitro. We have investigated the mechanism of action in terms of the well established stimulation by insulin of glucose uptake, glycogen synthesis, and the two enzyme perturbations that regulate the latter biochemical action. In the present paper we demonstrate that in addition to blocking each of these four actions of insulin in isolated rat diaphragm, the peptide alone acts as a weak positive effector 2774 on these same four parameters, suggesting that it may act very early in the sequence of actions initiated by insulin.
METHODS AND MATERIALSMale Wistar rats (140-180 g) were decapitated and their diaphragms were dissected either with or without the rib cage. The diaphragms were place...