2005
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.200400452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A DFT Study of the Adsorption and Dissociation of CO on Fe(100): Influence of Surface Coverage on the Nature of Accessible Adsorption States

Abstract: In the present article, we report adsorption energies, structures, and vibrational frequencies of CO on Fe(100) for several adsorption states and at three surface coverages. We have performed a full analysis of the vibrational frequencies of CO, thus determining what structures are stable adsorption states and characterizing the transition-state structure for CO dissociation. We have calculated the activation energy of dissociation of CO at 0.25 ML (ML = monolayers) as well as at 0.5 ML; we have studied the di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

25
122
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
25
122
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The activation energy (E Forward ) of CO dissociation on clean Fe (100) was 1.13 eV ( Table 2) and the recombination energy (E Back ) was 2.28 eV showing the exothermic nature of the dissociation process ( Table 2). The IS, TS and FS at 0 ML coverage of H are in good agreement with the other reported calculations of Wang et al [31], Tracy et al [32], Xun-hua et al [33], and Elahifard et al [37]. The direct dissociation of CO in the presence of coadsorbed H present slight variations of forward barrier to all coverages studied, where 1.06 eV, 1.16 eV and 0.90 eV were found for 1/3-asymmetric, 1/3-symmetric and 2/3 ML of H, respectively.…”
Section: Direct Dissociation Of Co In Presence Of Hydrogensupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The activation energy (E Forward ) of CO dissociation on clean Fe (100) was 1.13 eV ( Table 2) and the recombination energy (E Back ) was 2.28 eV showing the exothermic nature of the dissociation process ( Table 2). The IS, TS and FS at 0 ML coverage of H are in good agreement with the other reported calculations of Wang et al [31], Tracy et al [32], Xun-hua et al [33], and Elahifard et al [37]. The direct dissociation of CO in the presence of coadsorbed H present slight variations of forward barrier to all coverages studied, where 1.06 eV, 1.16 eV and 0.90 eV were found for 1/3-asymmetric, 1/3-symmetric and 2/3 ML of H, respectively.…”
Section: Direct Dissociation Of Co In Presence Of Hydrogensupporting
confidence: 91%
“…33 It predicts that two, three, and four-fold coordinated CO species form the most stable binding geometry in Fe 3,4 , Fe 5 , and Fe 6 , respectively. The reported CO stretching frequencies for these species are significantly below our experimental values for CO atop bound to Fe [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] , as would be expected. Unfortunately, we were unable to measure clusters this small to confirm the transition from high coordination binding in small clusters to atop binding in large clusters, that has some parallels in rhodium cluster CO complexes.…”
Section: A Ironcontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…They are also high compared to the values calculated for atop bound CO species on extended iron surfaces at low coverage, which are in the 1880-1920 cm -1 range. [27][28][29] As the bands above 2000 cm -1 appear only at higher CO coverage on the surfaces, it might be that they are not due to isolated CO molecules but related to the presence of geminal carbonyls formed at low coordinated Fe atoms at steps or defects. Slab model calculations studying the mechanism of Fe(CO) 5 formation on Fe(100) find that geminal binding can energetically compete with the formation of isolated CO ligands.…”
Section: A Ironmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 The activation barrier of 0.77 eV obtained during this calculation is significantly lower than most of the reported barriers for different surfaces, suggesting that the Fe 55 is much more reactive toward the CO dissociation than most of the stepped and flat Fe surfaces. It seems that the ability of the metal atoms to activate reactants changes substantially as the coordination of them is reduced on both the atomic steps and the vertexes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%