“…The eubacterial kingdom is mostly split between those organisms that have RNase E or RNase EG and those that have RNase M5+ We have identified only a few organisms in the various databases that have neither type of enzyme and some, members of the clostridial family, that have both+ Most organisms that have RNase E have CafA/RNase G as well, whereas most of those with RNase EG have no other close homologs on their chromosomes+ Given the almost equal evolutionary distance between RNase EG and RNase E and RNase G, it is possible that the latter nucleases arose by duplication of the gene encoding RNase EG and subsequent divergent evolution+ Interestingly, none of the bacteria having an RNase EG enzyme, and some bacterial species that have RNase E, do not possess an obvious RNase T homolog to perform the trimming reaction+ Recent evidence has suggested that, in vitro at least, RNase E and RNase G have overlapping substrate specificity (Tock et al+, 2000)+ It thus seems likely that RNase EG will behave similarly+ Indeed, an enzyme that cleaves E. coli 9S rRNA with the same specificity as RNase E has been identified in Streptomyces coelicolor (Hagege & Cohen, 1997), a high G ϩ C Grampositive bacterium+ Its roughly equal homology to RNase E and RNase G suggests it is an RNase EG-type nuclease+ Curiously, however, although this protein is similar in size to E. coli RNase E, it is a central portion of the enzyme that shows homology to the N-terminal catalytic domain of RNase E+ A similar situation is found in the closely related bacterium, Mycobacterium tuberculosis+ Most eubacteria having neither RNase E nor RNase EG, that is, the low G ϩ C Gram-positive group and B. burgdorferi, have an rnmV gene instead+ RNase M5 activity has also been demonstrated in extracts of two other Bacillus strains, Bacillus Q and Bacillus licheniformis (Stiekema et al+, 1980a(Stiekema et al+, , 1980b)+ Why the low G ϩ C Gram-positive bacteria should have RNase M5 and high G ϩ C Gram-positive organisms, RNase EG, is not immediately obvious+…”