1970
DOI: 10.2307/1127040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Developmental Study of the Relationship between Conceptual, Ego, and Moral Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
1

Year Published

1974
1974
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerous attempts to establish the link between ego and moral development resulted in mixed findings. Early researchers found substantial empirical and theoretical support for such a relationship (Gfellner, 1986;Kohlberg, 1981;Sullivan, McCullough & Stager, 1970). In the validation of the Sentence Completion Test (SCT) used to assess ego development, researchers reported positive correlations between SCT scores and moral development (Loevinger, 1979a;Williams & Vincent, 1985).…”
Section: Integrating Kohlberg's Moral Judgment With Loevinger's Ego Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerous attempts to establish the link between ego and moral development resulted in mixed findings. Early researchers found substantial empirical and theoretical support for such a relationship (Gfellner, 1986;Kohlberg, 1981;Sullivan, McCullough & Stager, 1970). In the validation of the Sentence Completion Test (SCT) used to assess ego development, researchers reported positive correlations between SCT scores and moral development (Loevinger, 1979a;Williams & Vincent, 1985).…”
Section: Integrating Kohlberg's Moral Judgment With Loevinger's Ego Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SCT shows significant positive correlation with other developmental stage tests of personalityfor instance, a correlation of about .4 or .6 with Kohlberg's moral judgment test with age partialed out (Lambert, 1972;E. V. Sullivan, McCullough, & Stager, 1970).…”
Section: Construct Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on the Loevinger instrument to date appears to be done with cross-sectional data, not with pre/post or longitudinal studies. Findings at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (Sullivan et al 1970) report scores for a sample of forty 14-year-olds (X ego score = 5.1) and a sample of forty 17-year-olds (X ego score = 6.5). (Comparisons are made using a 10-point ego maturity scale.)…”
Section: Loevinger and Wessler Ego Maturity Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%