1994
DOI: 10.1051/gse:19940603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A deterministic multi-tier model of assortative mating following selection

Abstract: A deterministic model is presented of assortative mating following selection on either phenotype or best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) estimates of breeding values (ebv) in an infinite population. The model is based on modified theory for multi-par rapport à la panmixie est de 11%, 24% et 66%, pour des taux respectifs de sélection sur la vge BLUP de 10%, 50% et 90%. Une simulation stochastique a été faite pour évaluer la précision du modèle déterministe. Les résultats, aussi bien déterministes que stochast… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, if there are a small number of loci, Fernando and Gianola found a larger effect, which appears to have arisen from faster allele frequency change under assortative mating (as opposed to generation of positive disequilibrium). Likewise, Shepherd and Kinghorn (1994) found a much larger effect gain with assortative mating when selection (and mating) are based on estimating breeding values (BLUP Selection) as opposed to simple individual selection. As Example 16.5 demonstrates, under the infinitesimal model the per-generation increase in response of a population subjected to multiple rounds of assortative mating prior to selection rapidly decays to zero once selection starts.…”
Section: Assortative Mating and Enhanced Responsementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, if there are a small number of loci, Fernando and Gianola found a larger effect, which appears to have arisen from faster allele frequency change under assortative mating (as opposed to generation of positive disequilibrium). Likewise, Shepherd and Kinghorn (1994) found a much larger effect gain with assortative mating when selection (and mating) are based on estimating breeding values (BLUP Selection) as opposed to simple individual selection. As Example 16.5 demonstrates, under the infinitesimal model the per-generation increase in response of a population subjected to multiple rounds of assortative mating prior to selection rapidly decays to zero once selection starts.…”
Section: Assortative Mating and Enhanced Responsementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The efficiency of assortative mating under truncation selection has been examined in detail by Baker (1973), DeLange (1974), Fernando and Gianola (1986), Smith and Hammond (1987), Tallis and Leppard (1988a), and Shepherd and Kinghorn (1994). The general conclusion is that the relative increase in response is greatest when h 2 is large and selection is weak.…”
Section: Assortative Mating and Enhanced Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to improve quantitative traits, animals are classified into subgroups based on identifiable and stable phenotypic characteristics. Some authors indicated that there was an increase in some genetic parameters with assortative mating system, which is mating of similar phenotypes animals (Shepherd and Kinghorn, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%