2007
DOI: 10.1137/050631616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Deterministic Algorithm for Finding All Minimum k‐Way Cuts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Karger and Stein improved this to an O(n (2−o(1))k )-time randomized MonteCarlo algorithm using the idea of random edgecontractions [13]. After Kamidoi et al [10] gave an O(n 4k+o(1) )-time deterministic algorithm based on divide-and-conquer, Thorup gave anÕ(n 2k )-time deterministic algorithm based on tree packings [25]. Small values of k ∈ [2, 6] also have been separately studied [19,9,2,12,20,21,16].…”
Section: Other Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karger and Stein improved this to an O(n (2−o(1))k )-time randomized MonteCarlo algorithm using the idea of random edgecontractions [13]. After Kamidoi et al [10] gave an O(n 4k+o(1) )-time deterministic algorithm based on divide-and-conquer, Thorup gave anÕ(n 2k )-time deterministic algorithm based on tree packings [25]. Small values of k ∈ [2, 6] also have been separately studied [19,9,2,12,20,21,16].…”
Section: Other Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem has applications in numerous areas of computer science, such as finding cutting planes for the traveling salesman problem, clusteringrelated settings (e.g., VLSI design), or network reliability [9]. In general, k-Way Cut is NPcomplete [31] but solvable in polynomial time for fixed k: a long line of research [31,42,44,65] led to a deterministic algorithm running in time O(mn 2k−2 ). The dependency on k in the exponent is probably unavoidable: from the parameterized perspective, the k-Way Cut problem parameterized by k is W [1]-hard [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For general graphs, there is a simple 2-approximation algorithm disconnecting each terminal from the others by a min-cut, but for any fixed k ≥ 3, the problem is APX-hard. Result 1 spawned many papers giving improved running times for the case of planar graphs and fixed k; see, e.g., [22,10,24,4]. Polyhedral work, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%