1965
DOI: 10.2307/3798454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Determination of Defecation Rate for Elk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One obvious source of variation results from interspecific, temporal, or spatial variations in faecal production rates (Thompson, White & Gowan 1998). Previous studies indicate that defection rates of ungulates often varies among individual animals and seasons (Neff, Wallmo & Morrison 1965;Mitchell et al 1985;Rogers 1987), suggesting that comparisons of faecal indices should be limited to within seasons (Thompson, White & Gowan 1998). Additional geographic variation in faecal production rate in relation to forage quality, precipitation, and other environmental gradients are poorly understood and warrant additional study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One obvious source of variation results from interspecific, temporal, or spatial variations in faecal production rates (Thompson, White & Gowan 1998). Previous studies indicate that defection rates of ungulates often varies among individual animals and seasons (Neff, Wallmo & Morrison 1965;Mitchell et al 1985;Rogers 1987), suggesting that comparisons of faecal indices should be limited to within seasons (Thompson, White & Gowan 1998). Additional geographic variation in faecal production rate in relation to forage quality, precipitation, and other environmental gradients are poorly understood and warrant additional study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7]32,36,38 Deer and elk defecate approximately 900,000 kg of feces and urinate approximately 14 million liters of urine in the area immediately surrounding the Cache la Poudre river per year. [39][40][41][42] Although urine and feces likely contain much lower prion loads than blood or saliva, the sheer amount of excreta may contribute significantly to overall environmental prion contamination.…”
Section: Prionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean deer pile density was <2 per 100 m 2 in all valleys. Deer defecate at approximately the same daily rate as elk (ϳ12.5 times per day); therefore, the number of piles of deer pellets and the number of piles of elk pellets can be compared to estimate the relative density of deer and elk with respect to one other (Neff et al 1965). Based on this comparison, elk were the dominant herbivore in the study area.…”
Section: (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%