2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0012-365x(99)00140-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A determinant property of Catalan numbers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is the sum of squares, cf. [47], which can also be easily seen by application of recursion (2.3). Furthermore, for the matrix A…”
Section: Hankel Matrices and Chebyshev Polynomialsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…is the sum of squares, cf. [47], which can also be easily seen by application of recursion (2.3). Furthermore, for the matrix A…”
Section: Hankel Matrices and Chebyshev Polynomialsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In several recent papers (e.g. [2], [47], [54], [62]) these determinants have been studied under various aspects and formulae were given for special parameters. Desainte-Catherine and Viennot in [24] provided the general solution d…”
Section: Hankel Matrices and Chebyshev Polynomialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this representation, one can show that H n (C(x)) = 1, H 1 n (C(x)) = 1. Then using induction and the condensation formula (5), one can show (see, e.g., [17]) that…”
Section: Sulanke and Xin's Quadratic Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the sequence of Catalan number: 1,1,2,5,14,42,132,429,1430 In recent years, a considerable amount of work has been devoted to Hankel determinants of path counting numbers, especially for weighted counting of lattice paths with up step (1, 1), level step ( , 0), ≥ 1, and down step (m − 1, −1), m ≥ 2. Many of such Hankel determinants have attractive compact closed formulas, such as that of Catalan numbers [17], Motzkin numbers [1,8], and Schröder numbers [3]. For instance, Motzkin numbers count lattice paths from (0, 0) to (n, 0) with step set {(1, 1), (1, 0), (1, −1)} that never go below the horizontal axis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result has been proven many times over. The path counting proof was given at least as early as [43], though it also appears in [9,35]. A proof resting on the Cholesky decomposition of C has also been discovered many times.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%