2023
DOI: 10.1080/01969722.2023.2175134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Detection of Intrusions Based on Deep Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 11 shows the comparison of binary and multiclass classification using the different datasets. Also, the XGBoost-DT got a test accuracy score of 90.85% compared to 81.42% for the GA-LR-DT with 20 UNSW-NB15 features, which is different from the outcomes in [17], where the GA-LR-DT was used. Moreover, the results obtained from this research outperform those obtained from previous research in which the sigmoid PIO selected 14 optimal features from the UNSW-NB15 and utilized the validation dataset to attain an accuracy score of 91.30%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 11 shows the comparison of binary and multiclass classification using the different datasets. Also, the XGBoost-DT got a test accuracy score of 90.85% compared to 81.42% for the GA-LR-DT with 20 UNSW-NB15 features, which is different from the outcomes in [17], where the GA-LR-DT was used. Moreover, the results obtained from this research outperform those obtained from previous research in which the sigmoid PIO selected 14 optimal features from the UNSW-NB15 and utilized the validation dataset to attain an accuracy score of 91.30%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The experimental approaches make use of the NSL-KDD dataset. The set of features was given the filter, and 14 features were chosen [16,17]. The author also considered both the multi and binary classification setup options, which included each of the five NSL-KDD attack types.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the highly reputable Bot-IoT dataset, the proposed model surpassed the highest accuracy, with a 99.8% ratio. Kamalakkannan et al [45] developed an improved CNN + LSTM model that learns spatial and temporal data characteristics, demonstrating 98% accuracy and a 98.14% average detection rate on the NSL-KDD dataset. www.ijacsa.thesai.org Shivhare et al [46] proposed a CNN + LSTM + SVM model to tackle multiclass tasks on the CICIDS 2017 dataset, achieving an accuracy of 97.29%.…”
Section: Hybrid Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%