2001
DOI: 10.1109/60.969474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A detection algorithm for islanding-prevention of dispersed consumer-owned storage and generating units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, test results have shown that for a small power mismatch between the DG and local loads, rate of change of frequency over power criterion is more sensitive than ROCOF over time criterion [13]. Furthermore, test results have shown that for a small power mismatch between the DG and local loads, rate of change of frequency over power criterion is more sensitive than ROCOF over time criterion [13].…”
Section: (B) Rate Of Change Of Frequency (Rocof) Relaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, test results have shown that for a small power mismatch between the DG and local loads, rate of change of frequency over power criterion is more sensitive than ROCOF over time criterion [13]. Furthermore, test results have shown that for a small power mismatch between the DG and local loads, rate of change of frequency over power criterion is more sensitive than ROCOF over time criterion [13].…”
Section: (B) Rate Of Change Of Frequency (Rocof) Relaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is proposed for increasing detection accuracy and reduction of NDZ. Furthermore, test results have shown that for a small power mismatch between the DG and local loads, rate of change of frequency over power criterion is more sensitive than ROCOF over time criterion [13].…”
Section: (D) Rate Of Change Of Frequency Over Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if the loading of the DG does not change significantly after an islanding situation takes place, then it cannot be detected by monitoring fundamental parameters such as voltage change or frequency deviation so utilizing other parameters such as voltage unbalance or total harmonic distortion (THD) has been proposed [85]. In [86] another method which utilizes the rate of change of frequency over power has been introduced.…”
Section: Islanding Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Passive techniques are very cost effective, as they do not require large modifications in the protection system [51][52][53][54][55][56]. Few common passive technique include the rate of change of frequency [63][64][65], ratio of frequency variation to load variation [66,67], rate of change of output power [60], rate of change of frequency over power [66], voltage unbalance [68,69], change of source impedance [70], harmonic distortion [68,71], voltage magnitude variation [72] and impedance based method to provide interlocking ROCOF relay [73]. Fig.…”
Section: Passive Islanding Detection Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%