2019
DOI: 10.2172/1529217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Detailed Wind Turbine Blade Cost Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a single WTB, a map consisting of blade dimensions such as the one seen in Figure 1 could be used. On the other hand, many different blades exist [17,18,68,69,100] and the different arrangements of shear webs, seen in Figure 2, present another mapping challenge. Therefore, generating a map for every blade becomes an infeasible solution.…”
Section: Path Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a single WTB, a map consisting of blade dimensions such as the one seen in Figure 1 could be used. On the other hand, many different blades exist [17,18,68,69,100] and the different arrangements of shear webs, seen in Figure 2, present another mapping challenge. Therefore, generating a map for every blade becomes an infeasible solution.…”
Section: Path Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With damage to WTs being unavoidable, an optimal strategy is needed between maintenance efforts and costs due to failures [7,15]. The Wind Turbine Blades (WTBs) are one of the most expensive parts of the structure [16], both in terms of material and labour costs [17,18], and replacing them is a costly operation, therefore, preventative maintenance is necessary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout the years, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory has released multiple models that estimate the costs of wind energy. This work combines a detailed blade cost model (Bortolotti et al, 2019a), a model to estimate the costs of the other wind turbine components and the overall turbine capital costs (Fingersh et al, 2006), and a financial model to compute the LCOE (Stehly and Beiter, 2019). Although the costs of some components-mostly in the nacelle-are estimated via semiempirical relations tuned on historical data that get updated every few years, the blade cost model adopts a bottom-up approach and estimates the total costs of a blade as the sum of variable and fixed costs.…”
Section: Cost Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the calculated blade mass of the LW-13 is almost double the blade mass of the IEA 3.4 MW at 31.6 t, it is very light for a 102m blade. For comparison, a 100 m blade developed from Sandia National Laboratories has a blade mass of 50 t based on estimates found in [20]. This could mean that the LW-13 could have a blade mass that is up to 33% lighter than a conventional turbine of the same rotor diameter, which could lead to significant cost decreases.…”
Section: The 100 W/m 2 Lowwind Turbinementioning
confidence: 99%