1995
DOI: 10.1109/36.406684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A detailed comparison of backpropagation neural network and maximum-likelihood classifiers for urban land use classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
137
1
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 335 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
137
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, we evaluate five prominent classifiers proposed in [25], [23], [14], [29], [9], [24]. These classifiers are quite diverse.…”
Section: Accuracy Evaluation Of Existing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To this end, we evaluate five prominent classifiers proposed in [25], [23], [14], [29], [9], [24]. These classifiers are quite diverse.…”
Section: Accuracy Evaluation Of Existing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These classifiers are quite diverse. Naive Bayes [25] is a probabilistic classifier; while Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) [23] and Radial Basis Function Network (RBFN) [14] belong to the category of neural networks. In comparison, Kstar [9] is a statistical classifier and J48 [24] is a decision tree classifier.…”
Section: Accuracy Evaluation Of Existing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from that, extraction of class-conditional spectral parameters using mean and standard deviation from supervised training sites of pure pixels used in the FMLP is dependent on the distribution of the reflectance values. In [17] it is observed that Neural Network classifiers as compared to statistical classifiers are nonparametric (distribution free). Statistical classifiers give incorrect results when reflectance values of classes are very close.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the initial learning rate and momentum are not crucial to the success of training stage. Also training speed is increased because the learning rate is adjusted to the highest value that does not cause instability (Paola and Schowengerdt, 1997). For accuracy assessment, a binary image is extracted from image-truth, assigning 1 to road and 0 to background pixels.…”
Section: Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%