2018
DOI: 10.5194/acp-18-1023-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A detailed characterization of the Saharan dust collected during the Fennec campaign in 2011: in situ ground-based and laboratory measurements

Abstract: Abstract. Millions of tons of mineral dust are lifted by the wind from arid surfaces and transported around the globe every year. The physical and chemical properties of the mineral dust are needed to better constrain remote sensing observations and are of fundamental importance for the understanding of dust atmospheric processes. Ground-based in situ measurements and in situ filter collection of Saharan dust were obtained during the Fennec campaign in the central Sahara in 2011. This paper presents results of… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(119 reference statements)
4
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detection limit of MODIS is reported as 0.03-0.05 [56]. The low values are in accordance with [57], where the authors performed a characterization of AOD in all regions in the world, and indicated that South America, in general, has mostly low AOD values, except during the South American main biomass burning season (from July to October). The NEB is not affected by these emissions, due to the typical atmospheric circulation patterns.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The detection limit of MODIS is reported as 0.03-0.05 [56]. The low values are in accordance with [57], where the authors performed a characterization of AOD in all regions in the world, and indicated that South America, in general, has mostly low AOD values, except during the South American main biomass burning season (from July to October). The NEB is not affected by these emissions, due to the typical atmospheric circulation patterns.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The PCASP was calibrated before and after the campaign, and the CDP was calibrated and cleaned before most flights during the campaign as described in Rosenberg et al (2012).…”
Section: Size Distribution Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PCASP and CDP employ light scattering in order to determine particle size; thus, the nominal size bins have been adjusted for a refractive index (RI) of dust of 1.53-0.001i, informed by the refractive index closure results from Sect. 2.5, using the CStoDConverter software (Rosenberg et al, 2012). This results in an increase in diameter of the largest size bins due to the more absorbing imaginary part of the refractive index as compared to PSL (polystyrene latex) used in the manufacturer's calibrations.…”
Section: Size Distribution Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.2). In the calculations, the real part of the complex refractive index of dust was assumed to be wavelength-independent and fixed at a value of 1.53, while the imaginary part was set to 0.003 at 450 and 550 nm and to 0.001 at 700 nm, according to pre-existing information (Sinyuk et al, 2003;Schladitz et al, 2009;Formenti et al, 2011;Rocha-Lima et al, 2018). For the different dust samples, Ctrunc ranged between 1.2 and 1.7 and decreased with wavelength and the dust residence time in the chamber, following the relative importance of the coarse component in the dust population (Anderson and Ogreen, 1998).…”
Section: Aerosol Scattering Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CC BY 4.0 License. Lima et al, 2018). Albeit some variability being instrumental or analytical (differences in the sampled size fraction or in the method used to retrieve optical parameters), differences persist when the same measurement approach and retrieval method are applied, e.g., in AERONET inversions, supporting the dependence of dust k and SSA with location (Dubovik et al, 2002;Koven and Fung, 2006;Su and Toon, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%