“…The THAI process on the other hand falls into the category of the so-called "short-distance displacement" processes (Turta and Singhal, 2004 ), and laboratory studies have shown it to exhibit very high recovery factors of up to 85% of oil originally in place (OOIP) and to provide upgrading by up to 8.2° API (Greaves et al, 2008 , 1999 ; Xia and Greaves, 2006 ). The THAI process has been extensively studied at laboratory (Greaves et al, 2008 ; Turta and Singhal, 2004 ; Xia et al, 2002a , 2002b , 2002c ; Xia and Greaves, 2006 , 2002 ; Xia et al, 2002a ; Zhao et al, 2021 , 2018 ), via laboratory-scale and field-scale numerical simulations (Ado, 2021 , 2020a , 2020b , 2020c ; Ado et al, 2019 ; Greaves et al, 2012a , 2012b , 2012c ; Rabiu Ado et al, 2018 , 2017 ) and at pilot and semi-commercial scales (Petrobank, 2009 , 2008 ; Touchstone, 2016 , 2015 ; Turta et al, 2020 ; Wei et al, 2020a , 2020b ). These studies have shown that when compared against other heavy oils recovery techniques, the THAI process has the following realizable potentials: (i) energy-self-sufficiency when waste heat is used to run utilities, (ii) having minimal surface-footprint as no surface upgrading facilities are needed, (iii) potential for being carbon-capture-ready so that the captured CO 2 can be sequestered or be used for EOR, etc.…”