2005
DOI: 10.1007/s11107-004-6435-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Detailed Analysis and Performance Comparison of Wavelength Reservation Schemes for Optical Burst Switched Networks?

Abstract: We present a detailed analysis of the JIT, JET, and Horizon wavelength reservation schemes for optical burst switched (OBS) networks. Our analysis accounts for several important parameters, including the burst offset length, and the optical switching and hardware processing overheads associated with bursts as they travel across the network. The contributions of our work include: (i) analytical models of JET and Horizon (on a single OBS node) that are more accurate than previously published ones, and which are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
72
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
72
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Before sending a burst, a signaling message is sent through a control channel along the path in order to perform the resource reservation and setup the switching ports on each node. Some strategies for reservation, such as Justin-Time (JIT), Horizon and Just-enough-Time (JET) were proposed, with their advantages and disadvantages concerning computational complexity and idle times discussed in [30]. In all signaling methods for OBS, resource reservation needs an offset time (t offset ), calculated as the minimum amount of time to provide all the resources reserved at destination node.…”
Section: Optical Burst Switchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Before sending a burst, a signaling message is sent through a control channel along the path in order to perform the resource reservation and setup the switching ports on each node. Some strategies for reservation, such as Justin-Time (JIT), Horizon and Just-enough-Time (JET) were proposed, with their advantages and disadvantages concerning computational complexity and idle times discussed in [30]. In all signaling methods for OBS, resource reservation needs an offset time (t offset ), calculated as the minimum amount of time to provide all the resources reserved at destination node.…”
Section: Optical Burst Switchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 3 shows the signaling steps for JIT mechanism, which is adopted in the present work and carefully described in [30].…”
Section: Optical Burst Switchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study is based on the standard OBS model defined in [13]. The traffic is injected at edges node, connected to core nodes.…”
Section: Adaptive Connection Control Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…IDs can be obtained during the aggregation process, by hashing the payload, or simply by combining their source and destination node indexes with a time stamp. The proposed scheme can be used with conventional scheduling algorithms as the FirstFit Void Filling (FFVF) and the Last Available Unscheduled Channel (LAUC) [13] and with both conventional (C-OBS) and offset time-emulated (E-OBS) OBS approaches [14]. We assume no buffering capabilities are available at core nodes.…”
Section: Adaptive Connection Control Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature, these principal burst scheduling schemes have been extensively analyzed regarding performance and realization complexity [Gau00, DGSB01,TR05]. The following paragraphs summarize and relate key findings on burst scheduling.…”
Section: The Temporal Scope Of Burst Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%