2014
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201403102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Designed Conformational Shift To Control Protein Binding Specificity

Abstract: In a conformational selection scenario, manipulating the populations of binding-competent states should be expected to affect protein binding. We demonstrate how in silico designed point mutations within the core of ubiquitin, remote from the binding interface, change the binding specificity by shifting the conformational equilibrium of the ground-state ensemble between open and closed substates that have a similar population in the wild-type protein. Binding affinities determined by NMR titration experiments … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We propose that the conformational landscape of the B domains in the context of the SARS-CoV S trimer, sampling open and closed conformations, decreases the apparent binding affinity for ACE2 and S230 due to masking of their binding sites in the closed state. A similar effect has previously been described for ubiquitin (Michielssens et al, 2014). The higher binding affinity of S230 for SARS-CoV S, compared to ACE2 ( Figure S7 Refolding to the postfusion conformation was detected by the appearance of a proteinase-Kresistant band migrating at approximately 55 kDa (Matsuyama and Taguchi, 2009).…”
Section: Activation Mechanism Of Coronavirus Membrane Fusionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…We propose that the conformational landscape of the B domains in the context of the SARS-CoV S trimer, sampling open and closed conformations, decreases the apparent binding affinity for ACE2 and S230 due to masking of their binding sites in the closed state. A similar effect has previously been described for ubiquitin (Michielssens et al, 2014). The higher binding affinity of S230 for SARS-CoV S, compared to ACE2 ( Figure S7 Refolding to the postfusion conformation was detected by the appearance of a proteinase-Kresistant band migrating at approximately 55 kDa (Matsuyama and Taguchi, 2009).…”
Section: Activation Mechanism Of Coronavirus Membrane Fusionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In recent years, the binding of ubiquitin to its various protein binding partners has become a key model system for investigations of conformational selection versus induced fit in protein/protein interactions (Bezsonova et al, 2008; Fenwick et al, 2011; Korzhnev et al, 2009; Lange et al, 2008; Michielssens et al, 2014; Phillips et al, 2013). While both mechanisms have been reported, some of the studies have been controversial and uncertainty persists in the field (Lange et al, 2008; Michielssens et al, 2014; Phillips et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While both mechanisms have been reported, some of the studies have been controversial and uncertainty persists in the field (Lange et al, 2008; Michielssens et al, 2014; Phillips et al, 2013). We briefly discuss below results with ubiquitin to highlight similarities and differences with the experimental approach presented here for recoverin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Later, de Groot and coworkers used a similar approach to shift the conformational equilibrium of ubiquitin 148 . Ubiquitin populates both an open and closed state and dynamically fluctuates between the two via a pincer-like motion.…”
Section: Engineering Functional Regions Into Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%