2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b01091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Description of the Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) Common Data Analysis Pipeline

Abstract: The Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) has produced large proteomics datasets from the mass spectrometric interrogation of tumor samples previously analyzed by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) program. The availability of the genomic and proteomic data is enabling proteogenomic study for both reference (i.e., contained in major sequence databases) and non-reference markers of cancer. The CPTAC labs have focused on colon, breast, and ovarian tissues in the first round of analyses; spectra from t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
86
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The downloaded data had been processed using the Common Data Analysis Pipeline (CDAP) (14), which standardizes the treatment of data across the consortium. CDAP software is flexible to accommodate different types of mass spectrometry data.…”
Section: Experimental Procedures and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The downloaded data had been processed using the Common Data Analysis Pipeline (CDAP) (14), which standardizes the treatment of data across the consortium. CDAP software is flexible to accommodate different types of mass spectrometry data.…”
Section: Experimental Procedures and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some large-scale efforts, such as the Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC), are addressing this shortcoming, proteomics and metabolomics is still catching up to the massively parallel nucleic acid profiling approaches in terms of ease of data generation, standardization, and accessibility. [104][105][106] Further improvements in multiplexing, more rapid and standardized separations, and improved mass-spectrometry scan speed and automation will be important criteria for continuing to advance the field. Proteomics and metabolomics raw data processing and feature identification…”
Section: Mass Spectrometry Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They evaluated the performance of the proposed method on synthetic data and on real DNA methylation, gene expression, and miRNA expression data from ovarian cancer samples extracted from TCGA. The second axis illustrated by four of the 15 pre-selected articles [13][14][15][16] is the rapid growth of proteomics data resource analysis and integration with genomics data enabling the emerging of proteogenomic approaches. The Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) [3] has produced large proteomics data sets from the mass spectrometric interrogation of tumor samples previously analyzed by TCGA program.…”
Section: Description Of Candidate Best Papers and Selected Best Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) [3] has produced large proteomics data sets from the mass spectrometric interrogation of tumor samples previously analyzed by TCGA program. In [13], the authors describe a tool named Common Data Analysis Platform (CDAP) produced by the CPTAC. Thanks to a dedicated pipeline, the goal of the CDAP is to provide standard and uniform reports for all CPTAC data (peptide-spectrum-match reports and gene-level reports), hence reducing the variability generated by disparate data analysis platforms and enabling comparisons between different samples and cancer types as well as across the major omics fields.…”
Section: Description Of Candidate Best Papers and Selected Best Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%