2019
DOI: 10.4102/phcfm.v11i1.1839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A description of community-based participatory research of hypertension awareness, prevention and treatment in a district of Matabeleland South Province, Zimbabwe

Abstract: Background Hypertension is an important worldwide public health challenge because of its high prevalence and concomitant risks of cardiovascular and kidney diseases. The risk factors for hypertension are well known, and screening, diagnosis and treatment of hypertension have been well researched. However, this knowledge has not been translated into community practice as there remains a huge knowledge gap between the academics, health workers and the communities. There is need for community partici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study findings were used to identify gaps in knowledge, attitudes and practices including myths and misconceptions by hypertensive patients and the community at large on hypertension. These were then used to develop the methodology for the implementation phase of the community participatory action research (CBPR) study we conducted (these study findings were published in a separate paper) [31]. The CIG validated the study findings, and they then used these findings during the action reflection cycles for planning and learning purposes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study findings were used to identify gaps in knowledge, attitudes and practices including myths and misconceptions by hypertensive patients and the community at large on hypertension. These were then used to develop the methodology for the implementation phase of the community participatory action research (CBPR) study we conducted (these study findings were published in a separate paper) [31]. The CIG validated the study findings, and they then used these findings during the action reflection cycles for planning and learning purposes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CIG validated the study findings, and they then used these findings during the action reflection cycles for planning and learning purposes. Subsequently, the implementation of new community strategies for improved primary prevention of hypertension in the CBPR study [31], were informed by the findings in this baseline quantitative study. Thus, by implication recommendations of improved service delivery from the hypertension CBPR study were influenced partly by the findings in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The health issues targeted by the interventions (some targeted several health issues) (see Figure 5 ) were: HIV ( n = 19), maternal and newborn health ( n = 14), child health (various diseases such as pneumonia, diarrhoea and malaria) ( n = 7), tuberculosis ( n = 4), epilepsy ( n = 2) ( Guinhouya et al , 2010 ; van Diessen et al , 2018 ), hypertension ( n = 2) ( Kotwani et al , 2014 ; Chimberengwa and Naidoo, 2019 ), obstetric complications ( n = 2) ( Kandeh et al , 1997 ; Seim et al , 2014 ), surgical care ( n = 1) ( Matousek et al , 2017 ), measles ( n = 1) ( Gignoux et al , 2018 ), schizophrenia ( n = 1) ( Asher et al , 2018 ), leprosy ( n = 1) ( Rogers et al , 2018 ), breast cancer ( n = 1) ( Kassam et al , 2017 ), elevated blood pressure ( n = 1) ( Neupane et al , 2018 ), rehabilitative care and orthopaedic reconstruction ( n = 1) ( Penny et al , 2007 ), sexually transmitted diseases ( n = 1) ( Behforouz et al , 2004 ; Koenig et al , 2004 ; Mukherjee et al , 2006 ; Mukherjee and Eustache, 2007 ) and no specific disease ( n = 1) ( Musinguzi et al , 2017 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Sources : (1) Altaras et al (2017) , (2) Andersen et al (2013) , (3) Asher et al (2018) , (4) Behforouz et al (2004) , (5) Besada et al (2018) , (6) Busza et al (2018) , (7) Chimberengwa and Naidoo (2019) , (8) Colbourn et al (2013) , (9) Datiko et al (2015) , (10) Manandhar et al (2004) , (11) Ediau et al (2013) , (12) Ekirapa-Kiracho et al (2017) , (13) Ferrand et al (2017) , (14) Franke et al (2013) , (15) Gignoux et al (2018) , (16) Guinhouya et al (2010) , (17) Gupta et al (2013) , (18) Gupta et al (2016) , (19) Haver et al (2015) , (20) Hounton et al (2009) , (21) Houweling et al (2016) , (22) Houweling et al (2019) , (23) Ivers et al (2011) , (24) Jackson and Hailemariam (2016) , (25) Jackson et al (2016) , (26) Kandeh et al (1997) , (27) Kassam et al (2017) , (28) Kema et al (2012) , (29) Koenig et al (2004) , (30) Konate et al (2011) , (31) Kotwani et al (2014) , (32) MacKellar et al (2018) , (33) Matousek et al (2017) , (34) Morrison et al (2010) , (35) Mugeni et al (2014) , (36) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 8 ] PRA has been conducted to address health issues such as infant health, HIV/AIDS, and menstrual hygiene [ Table 1 ]. [ 9 10 11 12 ] More examples of use of CBPR exist in diabetes,[ 13 ] hypertension,[ 14 ] and obesity,[ 15 ] among others. Environmental issues by their inherent close links to societal development provide one of the best areas for the demonstration of CBPR approach.…”
Section: U Se Of C Ommunity -B mentioning
confidence: 99%