2000
DOI: 10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.v6.i3.30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Description and Evaluation of the Effects of a Preengineering Program for Underrepresented, Low-Income, and/or First Generation College Students at the University of Akron

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transfer students can benefit from a supportive university environment that facilitates opportunities for their participation in activities that are customized to their needs and designed to promote their positive adjustment (Davies & Casey, ). Transfer students’ acclimation can be improved by their participation in activities such as bridge programs (Lam, Srlvatsan, Doversplke, Vesalo, & Mawasha, ), research internships (Russell, Hancock, & McCullough ), learning communities (Nestor‐Baker & Kerkor, ), supportive mentorship (Gatta & Trigg, ), and online forums intended to increase identification with the institution (McKenna & Bargh, ).…”
Section: Socmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transfer students can benefit from a supportive university environment that facilitates opportunities for their participation in activities that are customized to their needs and designed to promote their positive adjustment (Davies & Casey, ). Transfer students’ acclimation can be improved by their participation in activities such as bridge programs (Lam, Srlvatsan, Doversplke, Vesalo, & Mawasha, ), research internships (Russell, Hancock, & McCullough ), learning communities (Nestor‐Baker & Kerkor, ), supportive mentorship (Gatta & Trigg, ), and online forums intended to increase identification with the institution (McKenna & Bargh, ).…”
Section: Socmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, only one of the STEM-specific programs we found in the literature was included in either review (Lam et al, 2000). This was partly because some of these STEM programs were published after those reviews, but mainly because these initial reviews concerned K-12 intervention programs for groups under-represented in postsecondary education in general.…”
Section: Addressing Under-representation With Program Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice and in the literature, programs range from after-school clubs (e.g., Mawasha et al, 2001; Richardson et al, 2003; Thompson, 2002) and summer camps (e.g., Kort, 1996; McShea and Yarnevich, 1999; Lam et al, 2000; O’Brien et al, 1999; Rea-Poteat and Martin, 1991) to residential plans (e.g., Atwater et al , 1999; Jayaratne et al, 2003). Approaches vary from providing positive experiences in science and math (e.g., Bartsch et al, 1998; Kort, 1996; Marshall and Buckingham, 1995; Richardson et al, 2003; Kahle and Damnjanovic, 1994) and exposing students to STEM role models and career possibilities (Benore-Parsons et al, 1995; Campbell et al, 1998; Jayaratne et al, 2003; O’Brien et al, 1999; Rea-Poteat and Martin, 1991), to assisting students in early STEM “gateway” courses (Atwater et al, 1999; McShea and Yarnevich, 1999).…”
Section: K-12 Stem Intervention Programs: What Do They Look Like?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evaluation showed positive program effects such as university retention after two years that was comparable to the general student body and better than a matched comparison group (Newman, Myers, Newman, Lohman, and Smith, 2000;Newman and Newman, 1999). • A University of Akron pre-engineering program targeted low income 9th-to 12th-graders in Upward Bound and provided a 6-week on-campus summer program as well as academic year support; 100% of the students graduated from high school and 97% entered college, but no comparison group was used (Lam, Mawasha, Doverspike, McClain, and Vesalo, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%