A description and comparison of experiences of people with mental disorders in supported employment and paid prevocational training.

Bedell, Jeffrey R.; Draving, Deborah; Parrish, Amy; Gervey, Robert; Guastadisegni, Paul

doi:10.1037/h0095301

Cited by 48 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Current research also indicates that supported employment neither causes undue stress nor precipitates exacerbations of illness. 9,20,21 Individual placement and support (IPS) provides a manualized approach to supported employment for patients with SMD, in which vocational services are integrated within mental health teams. 22,23 In a previous clinical trial in New Hampshire, we compared employment services delivered via the IPS model with standard, stepwise vocational services delivered by a rehabilitation agency.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Supported Employment for Inner-city Patients With Severe Mental Disorders

Drake¹,

McHugo²,

Bebout³

et al. 1999

Arch Gen Psychiatry

342

276

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Supported Employment for Inner-city Patients With Severe Mental Disorders

Drake¹,

McHugo²,

Bebout³

et al. 1999

Arch Gen Psychiatry

342

276

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Over 85% of persons with SMI are unemployed, despite compelling evidence that most want to work (McQuilken et al, 2003) and are capable of working in competitive employment, nearly always preferring competitive employment over sheltered work (Bedell, Draving, Parrish, Gervey, & Guastadisegni, 1998). Unfortunately, consumer surveys often find that assistance with employment is a major unmet need, largely unrecognized by practitioners (Crane-Ross, Roth, & Lauber, 2000;Noble, Honberg, Hall, & Flynn, 1997), perhaps because they often misjudge consumers as ''unmotivated'' (Braitman et al, 1995).…”

Section: Current Realities For People With Smimentioning

confidence: 99%

How Evidence-Based Practices Contribute to Community Integration

Bond

Salyers

Rollins

et al. 2004

Community Ment Health J

157

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since the groundbreaking work of the Robert Wood Johnson Conference in 1998 identifying six evidence-based practices (EBPs) for people with severe mental illness (SMI), the mental health field has moved in the direction of re-examination and redesign of service systems. Surprisingly, one area that has not been fully explicated is the role that EBPs play in promoting community integration. In this paper, we explain how community integration is a unifying concept providing direction and vision for community mental health for people with SMI. As one crucial aspect of the recovery process, community integration clarifies the link between EBPs and recovery. We propose an alternate view, grounded in the empirical literature, to the assertion by Anthony, Rogers, and Farkas [2003, Community Mental Health Journal, 39, 101-114] that ''EBP research has rarely demonstrated a positive impact on recovery related outcomes.'' Gary R. Bond and Michelle P. Salyers are affiliated with the

show abstract

“…With respect to participants, proponents of IPS SE have emphasized the importance of avoiding preemployment activities such as training and education specifically because of the potential that they may delay and distract participants from job acquisition [12]. Despite the strong desire of participants for competitive employment [28], two separate studies found evidence that in some situations, intermediate work activities such as transitional employment placements can represent a distraction or disincentive to advancing to competitive employment and that participants in these activities may be less interested in pursuing competitive jobs than they were initially [20,29].…”

Section: What Other Outcomes Beyond Competitive Employment Should Bementioning

confidence: 99%

Vocational services research: Recommendations for next stage of work

Drebing¹,

Bell²,

Campinell³

et al. 2012

JRRD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-As the field of vocational services (VS) research matures, it is necessary to review its progress and identify any important gaps in measurement and methodology that may hamper future efforts. To encourage progress, we have identified (1) ways to increase consistency in measuring employment outcomes, (2) emerging patterns and lingering gaps in the range of variables and measures commonly used in VS research, (3) broader methodological patterns and needs in the area of study design and sampling, (4) interventions that warrant additional study, and (5) broad strategies to increase the overall amount and quality of VS research. The goal of this article is to assist the field in achieving clearer coherence in shared expectations and standards for research so that the field can consolidate its gains as it helps people successfully return to rewarding jobs in the community.

show abstract

A description and comparison of experiences of people with mental disorders in supported employment and paid prevocational training.

Cited by 48 publications

References 7 publications

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Supported Employment for Inner-city Patients With Severe Mental Disorders

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Supported Employment for Inner-city Patients With Severe Mental Disorders

How Evidence-Based Practices Contribute to Community Integration

Vocational services research: Recommendations for next stage of work

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About