2016
DOI: 10.1017/nmj.2016.64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Descent Theorem for Formal Smoothness

Abstract: Abstract. Let u be a local homomorphism of noetherian local rings forming part of a commutative square vf = gu. We give some conditions on the square which imply that u is formally smooth. This theorem encapsulates a variety of (apparently unrelated) results in commutative algebra greatly improving some of them: Greco's theorem on descent of quasi-excellence property by finite surjective morphisms, Kunz's characterization of regular local rings in positive characteristic by means of the Frobenius homomorphism … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…iii) The good properties of André-Quillen homology (for example, the ones stated above and its behaviour under tensor products [1, Proposition 5.21]) allow us to obtain new examples of h 2 -vanishing homomorphisms from others.Remarks 7. (i)It can be proved that if f : A → A is contracting, then for any n 0, there exists s (depending on n) such that f s has the h n -vanishing property, that is, it induces the zero map H n (A, k, k) → H n (A, k, k)[19, Proposition 10]. However, our ad hoc proof given here for the case in which n = 2, besides being simpler and shorter, gives a better idea of the relationship between contracting and h 2 -vanishing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…iii) The good properties of André-Quillen homology (for example, the ones stated above and its behaviour under tensor products [1, Proposition 5.21]) allow us to obtain new examples of h 2 -vanishing homomorphisms from others.Remarks 7. (i)It can be proved that if f : A → A is contracting, then for any n 0, there exists s (depending on n) such that f s has the h n -vanishing property, that is, it induces the zero map H n (A, k, k) → H n (A, k, k)[19, Proposition 10]. However, our ad hoc proof given here for the case in which n = 2, besides being simpler and shorter, gives a better idea of the relationship between contracting and h 2 -vanishing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%